Comparison Overview

Rothko Chapel

VS

Barberville Pioneer Settlement

Rothko Chapel

3900 Yupon St, Houston, Texas, 77006, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The Rothko Chapel, founded by Houston philanthropists John and Dominique de Menil, was dedicated in 1971 as an intimate sanctuary available to people of every belief. A tranquil meditative environment inspired by the mural canvases of Russian born American painter Mark Rothko (1903-1970), the Chapel welcomes over 100,000 visitors each year, people of every faith and from all parts of the world. On the plaza, Barnett Newman's majestic sculpture, Broken Obelisk, stands in memory of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. The Chapel has two vocations: contemplation and action. It is a place alive with religious ceremonies of all faiths, and where the experience and understanding of all traditions are encouraged and made available. Action takes the form of supporting human rights, and thus the Chapel has become a rallying place for all people concerned with peace, freedom, and social justice throughout the world. Social Media Guidelines - https://bit.ly/3rPXIWZ

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Barberville Pioneer Settlement

1776 Lightfoot Lane, Barberville, FL 32105, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

This non-profit historical village museum is situated on a thirty-acre campus that features 18 historical structures and a collection of over 10,000 items. The Settlement offers self guided and guided tours, field trips, workshops and demonstrations, as well as rental facilities for meetings, small weddings and special events. The mission of the Barberville Pioneer Settlement is to educate and entrust the public and future generations with knowledge of the pioneer lifestyle of our forefathers through hands on experience, folk demonstrations, preservation and historic exhibits.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-rothko-chapel.jpeg
Rothko Chapel
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barberville-pioneer-settlement.jpeg
Barberville Pioneer Settlement
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rothko Chapel
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Barberville Pioneer Settlement
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rothko Chapel in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Barberville Pioneer Settlement in 2025.

Incident History — Rothko Chapel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rothko Chapel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Barberville Pioneer Settlement (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Barberville Pioneer Settlement cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-rothko-chapel.jpeg
Rothko Chapel
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barberville-pioneer-settlement.jpeg
Barberville Pioneer Settlement
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Barberville Pioneer Settlement company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rothko Chapel company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Barberville Pioneer Settlement company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Rothko Chapel company.

In the current year, Barberville Pioneer Settlement company and Rothko Chapel company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Barberville Pioneer Settlement company nor Rothko Chapel company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Barberville Pioneer Settlement company nor Rothko Chapel company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Barberville Pioneer Settlement company nor Rothko Chapel company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Rothko Chapel company nor Barberville Pioneer Settlement company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Rothko Chapel nor Barberville Pioneer Settlement holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Rothko Chapel company nor Barberville Pioneer Settlement company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Rothko Chapel company employs more people globally than Barberville Pioneer Settlement company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Rothko Chapel nor Barberville Pioneer Settlement holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rothko Chapel nor Barberville Pioneer Settlement holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rothko Chapel nor Barberville Pioneer Settlement holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rothko Chapel nor Barberville Pioneer Settlement holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rothko Chapel nor Barberville Pioneer Settlement holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rothko Chapel nor Barberville Pioneer Settlement holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X