Comparison Overview

RM2

VS

The Colorado Bar Association

RM2

Sycamore House, New Malden, KT3 4QS, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

RM2 Employee Ownership designs, implements and administers employee share schemes and employee ownership trusts. Formed in 1998, we have the most experienced team of advisers dedicated to private company employee share schemes and employee ownership in the UK. Our clients range from owner-managed businesses to private equity backed businesses, from family firms to subsidiaries of non-UK multinationals. We also help business owners realise the value in their companies by structuring and financing change-of-control employee ownership transactions.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Colorado Bar Association

1290 Broadway, Ste. 1700, Denver, Colorado, US, 80203
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1897, the Colorado Bar Association (CBA) is a voluntary organization dedicated to advancing the legal profession and serving the community. With nearly 16,000 members, we provide attorneys with essential resources, including professional development, networking opportunities, and advocacy for the legal profession. Our mission is to support and improve the practice of law while supporting the justice system and enriching our community. Through our diverse sections, committees, and programs, we foster collaboration, uphold ethical standards, and champion the rule of law. At the CBA, we believe in empowering legal professionals through continuing education, leadership development, and member-driven initiatives. We also work to connect attorneys with pro bono opportunities and community service projects that make a meaningful impact. Whether you are a seasoned practitioner, new attorney, law student, or Licensed Legal Paraprofessional, the Colorado Bar Association is your professional growth and service partner. Learn more about our programs and membership benefits at www.cobar.org.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 75
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-rm2-partnership-ltd.jpeg
RM2
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cobarassoc.jpeg
The Colorado Bar Association
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
RM2
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Colorado Bar Association
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RM2 in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Colorado Bar Association in 2025.

Incident History — RM2 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RM2 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Colorado Bar Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Colorado Bar Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-rm2-partnership-ltd.jpeg
RM2
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cobarassoc.jpeg
The Colorado Bar Association
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both RM2 company and The Colorado Bar Association company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, The Colorado Bar Association company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to RM2 company.

In the current year, The Colorado Bar Association company and RM2 company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Colorado Bar Association company nor RM2 company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Colorado Bar Association company nor RM2 company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Colorado Bar Association company nor RM2 company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither RM2 company nor The Colorado Bar Association company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither RM2 nor The Colorado Bar Association holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither RM2 company nor The Colorado Bar Association company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Colorado Bar Association company employs more people globally than RM2 company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither RM2 nor The Colorado Bar Association holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither RM2 nor The Colorado Bar Association holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither RM2 nor The Colorado Bar Association holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither RM2 nor The Colorado Bar Association holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither RM2 nor The Colorado Bar Association holds HIPAA certification.

Neither RM2 nor The Colorado Bar Association holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X