Comparison Overview

The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield

VS

Amstelring

The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield

2211 Mount Vernon Ave, None, Bakersfield, California, US, 93306
Last Update: 2025-12-24

The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield is a skilled nursing home and rehabilitation facility located in Bakersfield, California. At our center, we pride ourselves on a collaborative team approach to comprehensive care. Our dedicated professionals deliver exceptional 24-hour nursing care, emphasizing not just physical health but also holistic well-being. Beyond our esteemed short-term and long-term care services, we cater to specialized nursing needs and offer vital medical social services. Moreover, we are committed to nurturing the complete wellness of our residents, providing a spectrum of therapies including physical, occupational, and speech therapy with state-of-the-art rehabilitation technology and equipment. Alongside these services, we foster a vibrant atmosphere by engaging residents in daily activities that enrich the mind, body, and spirit.

NAICS: 623
NAICS Definition: Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Amstelring

Saaftingestraat 8, Amsterdam, 1069, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-21

Bij Amstelring kijken en luisteren we naar mensen. Wie waren zij voordat ze hulp, ondersteuning en zorg nodig hadden? Wat willen en kunnen zij nu de gevolgen van dementie, ouderdom en chronische ziekten zichtbaar en merkbaar zijn? En wie en wat is belangrijk in deze fase van hun leven? Het gewone leven ondersteunen, dat doen we samen, gelijkwaardig en met respect voor elkaars rol, positie en bijdrage. Dat is onze missie en zijn onze waarden. Samen is met zo'n 3.700 professionals op 23 locaties, in circa 50 wijkzorgteams, op de dagbesteding, in de thuisbegeleiding en in de ondersteuning. En met de inzet van vele naasten en vrijwilligers. Amsterdam, de regio Amstelland De Meerlanden en Haarlemmermeer is ons werkgebied.

NAICS: 623
NAICS Definition: Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities
Employees: 1,435
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-rehabilitation-center-of-bakersfield.jpeg
The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amstelring.jpeg
Amstelring
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Amstelring
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield in 2025.

Incidents vs Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Amstelring in 2025.

Incident History — The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Amstelring (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amstelring cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-rehabilitation-center-of-bakersfield.jpeg
The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amstelring.jpeg
Amstelring
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Amstelring company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Amstelring company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield company.

In the current year, Amstelring company and The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Amstelring company nor The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Amstelring company nor The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Amstelring company nor The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield company nor Amstelring company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield nor Amstelring holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield company nor Amstelring company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Amstelring company employs more people globally than The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield company, reflecting its scale as a Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities.

Neither The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield nor Amstelring holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield nor Amstelring holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield nor Amstelring holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield nor Amstelring holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield nor Amstelring holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Rehabilitation Center of Bakersfield nor Amstelring holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

httparty is an API tool. In versions 0.23.2 and prior, httparty is vulnerable to SSRF. This issue can pose a risk of leaking API keys, and it can also allow third parties to issue requests to internal servers. This issue has been patched via commit 0529bcd.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

5ire is a cross-platform desktop artificial intelligence assistant and model context protocol client. In versions 0.15.2 and prior, an RCE vulnerability exists in useMarkdown.ts, where the markdown-it-mermaid plugin is initialized with securityLevel: 'loose'. This configuration explicitly permits the rendering of HTML tags within Mermaid diagram nodes. This issue has not been patched at time of publication.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

continuwuity is a Matrix homeserver written in Rust. Prior to version 0.5.0, this vulnerability allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to force the target server to cryptographically sign arbitrary membership events. The flaw exists because the server fails to validate the origin of a signing request, provided the event's state_key is a valid user ID belonging to the target server. This issue has been patched in version 0.5.0. A workaround for this issue involves blocking access to the PUT /_matrix/federation/v2/invite/{roomId}/{eventId} endpoint using the reverse proxy.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LangChain is a framework for building LLM-powered applications. Prior to @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and prior to langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain JS's toJSON() method (and subsequently when string-ifying objects using JSON.stringify(). The method did not escape objects with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form data in kwargs. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

LangChain is a framework for building agents and LLM-powered applications. Prior to versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain's dumps() and dumpd() functions. The functions do not escape dictionaries with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form dictionaries. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N