Comparison Overview

The Quest Group

VS

RedFish Graphics

The Quest Group

None, None, None, None, US, 76053
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Over thirty years of proven marketing and media experience blended with concept, research, and planning ability has shaped and strengthened the Quest Group's market-proven approach to providing creative, cost-effective strategies and solutions for our clients. Our multi-skilled team works to implement an expanded range of professional services. We are committed to addressing your individual concerns and meeting your specific needs. Our team delivers integrated personal attention to your bottom line . . . providing you with positive results and profitability.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

RedFish Graphics

undefined, Ottawa, undefined, undefined, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

RedFish Graphics is an Ottawa-based graphic and web design company. I offer a wide range of services, from logo design and branding, to corporate newsletters and website design. I've also developed a specialization in working with non-profit organizations, many of whom are stuck with websites that they can't update. Whether you need a website built from scratch or are looking to improve an existing one, I will work with you to ensure that your new site is one that you can continue to update going forward, using user-friendly WordPress software.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-quest-group_2.jpeg
The Quest Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/redfish-graphics.jpeg
RedFish Graphics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Quest Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
RedFish Graphics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Quest Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RedFish Graphics in 2025.

Incident History — The Quest Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Quest Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — RedFish Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RedFish Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-quest-group_2.jpeg
The Quest Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/redfish-graphics.jpeg
RedFish Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

RedFish Graphics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Quest Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, RedFish Graphics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Quest Group company.

In the current year, RedFish Graphics company and The Quest Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither RedFish Graphics company nor The Quest Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither RedFish Graphics company nor The Quest Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither RedFish Graphics company nor The Quest Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Quest Group company nor RedFish Graphics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Quest Group nor RedFish Graphics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Quest Group company nor RedFish Graphics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both The Quest Group company and RedFish Graphics company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither The Quest Group nor RedFish Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Quest Group nor RedFish Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Quest Group nor RedFish Graphics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Quest Group nor RedFish Graphics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Quest Group nor RedFish Graphics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Quest Group nor RedFish Graphics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X