Comparison Overview

The Public Sector HealthCare Roundtable

VS

Advocate Health Care

The Public Sector HealthCare Roundtable

Alexandria, Virginia, US, 22313
Last Update: 2025-12-03

The Roundtable gives public sector health care purchasers and State and local health plan administrators a voice in the design, development, and implementation of national health care policy. Through in-depth policy analysis and relationships with key decision-makers in Washington, D.C. the Roundtable is able to fuel a robust provider network and health delivery system that benefits all citizens.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Advocate Health Care

3075 Highland Pkwy, Downers Grove, Illinois, US, 60515
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Advocate Health Care is proud to be a part of Advocate Health, the third-largest nonprofit integrated health system in the U.S. Advocate Health is the third-largest nonprofit, integrated health system in the United States, created from the combination of Advocate Aurora Health and Atrium Health. Providing care under the names Advocate Health Care in Illinois; Atrium Health in the Carolinas, Georgia and Alabama; and Aurora Health Care in Wisconsin, Advocate Health is a national leader in clinical innovation, health outcomes, consumer experience and value-based care. Headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina, Advocate Health services nearly 6 million patients and is engaged in hundreds of clinical trials and research studies, with Wake Forest University School of Medicine serving as the academic core of the enterprise. It is nationally recognized for its expertise in cardiology, neurosciences, oncology, pediatrics and rehabilitation, as well as organ transplants, burn treatments and specialized musculoskeletal programs. Advocate Health employs nearly 150,000 team members across 68 hospitals and over 1,000 care locations, and offers one of the nation’s largest graduate medical education programs with over 2,000 residents and fellows across more than 200 programs. Committed to providing equitable care for all, Advocate Health provides nearly $5 billion in annual community benefits. Learn more: advocatehealth.org Read our social media community engagement guidelines: aah.org/social

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 10,869
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-public-sector-healthcare-roundtable.jpeg
The Public Sector HealthCare Roundtable
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/advocate-health-care.jpeg
Advocate Health Care
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Public Sector HealthCare Roundtable
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Advocate Health Care
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Public Sector HealthCare Roundtable in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Advocate Health Care in 2025.

Incident History — The Public Sector HealthCare Roundtable (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Public Sector HealthCare Roundtable cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Advocate Health Care (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Advocate Health Care cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-public-sector-healthcare-roundtable.jpeg
The Public Sector HealthCare Roundtable
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2024
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/advocate-health-care.jpeg
Advocate Health Care
Incidents

Date Detected: 07/2013
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Physical Theft
Motivation: Unknown
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Advocate Health Care company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Public Sector HealthCare Roundtable company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

The Public Sector HealthCare Roundtable and Advocate Health Care have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Advocate Health Care company and The Public Sector HealthCare Roundtable company have not reported any cyber incidents.

The Public Sector HealthCare Roundtable company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Advocate Health Care company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Advocate Health Care company has disclosed at least one data breach, while The Public Sector HealthCare Roundtable company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Advocate Health Care company nor The Public Sector HealthCare Roundtable company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Public Sector HealthCare Roundtable company nor Advocate Health Care company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Public Sector HealthCare Roundtable nor Advocate Health Care holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Public Sector HealthCare Roundtable company nor Advocate Health Care company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Advocate Health Care company employs more people globally than The Public Sector HealthCare Roundtable company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither The Public Sector HealthCare Roundtable nor Advocate Health Care holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Public Sector HealthCare Roundtable nor Advocate Health Care holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Public Sector HealthCare Roundtable nor Advocate Health Care holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Public Sector HealthCare Roundtable nor Advocate Health Care holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Public Sector HealthCare Roundtable nor Advocate Health Care holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Public Sector HealthCare Roundtable nor Advocate Health Care holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X