Comparison Overview

The Print Agency

VS

St. Louis Tag Co.

The Print Agency

408 Wimborne Road East, Ferndown, Dorset bh23 2dq, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.theprintagency.com

The Print Agency can help you stand out from the crowd... Need original design and quality printing doing at short notice and on budget? Talk to The Print Agency in Ferndown Dorset. Let us talk to you about your requirements for your business, promotion or event. One off posters and banners or long print runs. Fantatsic prices, short lead time and amazing quality!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

St. Louis Tag Co.

3201 Laclede Station, St. Louis, MO, 63143, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
https://www.stlouistag.com/

For over 60 years, St. Louis Tag has been the industry leader in the specialized manufacturing and finishing of custom printed hang tags. We proudly provide specialty hang tags of all shapes, sizes and substrates to virtually all industries. From travel to retail to inventory to manufacturing, our tag products are guaranteed to exceed expectations in even the most unique applications. Our mission is to produce the highest quality hang tags to suit every need in any industry by providing unmatched customer service to ensure 100% satisfaction. Our “T.A.G.”, Total Assurance Guarantee ®, means that the St. Louis Tag Customer Care Group is with you through every step of the service and manufacturing process. With state-of-the-art equipment, commercial printing expertise, and experienced graphic design professionals, there is no project too complex for St. Louis Tag. We offer an array of paper and synthetic stocks to choose from along with many attachment and tag finishing options. We guarantee to produce hang tags that suit every need. We understand that hang tags are an important piece of your company and industry, and with St. Louis Tag, no finishing touches will ever go unnoticed.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-print-agency.jpeg
The Print Agency
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st.-louis-tag-co..jpeg
St. Louis Tag Co.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Print Agency
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
St. Louis Tag Co.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Print Agency in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for St. Louis Tag Co. in 2025.

Incident History — The Print Agency (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Print Agency cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — St. Louis Tag Co. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

St. Louis Tag Co. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-print-agency.jpeg
The Print Agency
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/st.-louis-tag-co..jpeg
St. Louis Tag Co.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both The Print Agency company and St. Louis Tag Co. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, St. Louis Tag Co. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Print Agency company.

In the current year, St. Louis Tag Co. company and The Print Agency company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither St. Louis Tag Co. company nor The Print Agency company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither St. Louis Tag Co. company nor The Print Agency company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither St. Louis Tag Co. company nor The Print Agency company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Print Agency company nor St. Louis Tag Co. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Print Agency nor St. Louis Tag Co. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Print Agency company nor St. Louis Tag Co. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

St. Louis Tag Co. company employs more people globally than The Print Agency company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither The Print Agency nor St. Louis Tag Co. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Print Agency nor St. Louis Tag Co. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Print Agency nor St. Louis Tag Co. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Print Agency nor St. Louis Tag Co. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Print Agency nor St. Louis Tag Co. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Print Agency nor St. Louis Tag Co. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References