Comparison Overview

The Postal Museum

VS

Global Cultural Districts Network (GCDN)

The Postal Museum

15-20 Phoenix Place , Clerkenwell, London, WC1X 0DA, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-03
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.postalmuseum.org

The Postal Museum tells the story of postal communication and its impact on global society. At the museum and online we bring five centuries of extraordinary communications history to life, as seen through the eyes of the iconic postal service. On a visit, experience interactive and family-friendly permanent and temporary exhibitions, join special events and learning activities, use modern research facilities and take an immersive ride on Mail Rail, London’s secret Post Office underground railway. The Postal Museum is the public identity of the Postal Heritage Trust, an independent charity created to protect and share this rich history and heritage.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 84
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Global Cultural Districts Network (GCDN)

Strand, None, London, England, GB, None
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799
https://gcdn.net

The Global Cultural Districts Network (GCDN) is committed to improving the quality of urban life through the contribution of the arts, culture, and the creative industries. GCDN members represent policymakers, planners, and executives from widely diverse international contexts, all working at the intersection of culture and sustainable urban development. GCDN is an initiative of AEA Consulting.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-postal-museum.jpeg
The Postal Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/global-cultural-districts-network.jpeg
Global Cultural Districts Network (GCDN)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Postal Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Global Cultural Districts Network (GCDN)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Postal Museum in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Global Cultural Districts Network (GCDN) in 2025.

Incident History — The Postal Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Postal Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Global Cultural Districts Network (GCDN) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Global Cultural Districts Network (GCDN) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-postal-museum.jpeg
The Postal Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/global-cultural-districts-network.jpeg
Global Cultural Districts Network (GCDN)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Postal Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Global Cultural Districts Network (GCDN) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Global Cultural Districts Network (GCDN) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Postal Museum company.

In the current year, Global Cultural Districts Network (GCDN) company and The Postal Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Global Cultural Districts Network (GCDN) company nor The Postal Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Global Cultural Districts Network (GCDN) company nor The Postal Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Global Cultural Districts Network (GCDN) company nor The Postal Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Postal Museum company nor Global Cultural Districts Network (GCDN) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Postal Museum nor Global Cultural Districts Network (GCDN) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Postal Museum company nor Global Cultural Districts Network (GCDN) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Postal Museum company employs more people globally than Global Cultural Districts Network (GCDN) company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither The Postal Museum nor Global Cultural Districts Network (GCDN) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Postal Museum nor Global Cultural Districts Network (GCDN) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Postal Museum nor Global Cultural Districts Network (GCDN) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Postal Museum nor Global Cultural Districts Network (GCDN) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Postal Museum nor Global Cultural Districts Network (GCDN) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Postal Museum nor Global Cultural Districts Network (GCDN) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References