Comparison Overview

The Postal Museum

VS

Foundation for the WA Museum

The Postal Museum

15-20 Phoenix Place , Clerkenwell, London, WC1X 0DA, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-24
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.postalmuseum.org

The Postal Museum tells the story of postal communication and its impact on global society. At the museum and online we bring five centuries of extraordinary communications history to life, as seen through the eyes of the iconic postal service. On a visit, experience interactive and family-friendly permanent and temporary exhibitions, join special events and learning activities, use modern research facilities and take an immersive ride on Mail Rail, London’s secret Post Office underground railway. The Postal Museum is the public identity of the Postal Heritage Trust, an independent charity created to protect and share this rich history and heritage.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 84
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Foundation for the WA Museum

140 William St, Perth, Western Australia, 6000, AU
Last Update: 2026-01-24
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fwam.com.au

The best structures are built on strong foundations. The Foundation for the WA Museum believes that museums should spark a love of learning in the next generation. They should nurture a fascination with the past, an understanding of the present, and a passion for the future – and inspire us all in unexpected ways. Importantly, they should influence and motivate young people to investigate the areas of science, technology, the arts and mathematics in the world around them. The Foundation for the WA Museum is an independent organisation that has been committed to securing the future of our state heritage since 1995.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-postal-museum.jpeg
The Postal Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Postal Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Foundation for the WA Museum
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Postal Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Foundation for the WA Museum in 2026.

Incident History — The Postal Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Postal Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Foundation for the WA Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Foundation for the WA Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-postal-museum.jpeg
The Postal Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foundation-for-the-wa-museum.jpeg
Foundation for the WA Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Postal Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Foundation for the WA Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Foundation for the WA Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Postal Museum company.

In the current year, Foundation for the WA Museum company and The Postal Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Foundation for the WA Museum company nor The Postal Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Foundation for the WA Museum company nor The Postal Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Foundation for the WA Museum company nor The Postal Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Postal Museum company nor Foundation for the WA Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Postal Museum nor Foundation for the WA Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Postal Museum company nor Foundation for the WA Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Postal Museum company employs more people globally than Foundation for the WA Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither The Postal Museum nor Foundation for the WA Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Postal Museum nor Foundation for the WA Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Postal Museum nor Foundation for the WA Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Postal Museum nor Foundation for the WA Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Postal Museum nor Foundation for the WA Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Postal Museum nor Foundation for the WA Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References