Comparison Overview

The Postal Museum

VS

Bullock Texas State History Museum

The Postal Museum

15-20 Phoenix Place , Clerkenwell, London, WC1X 0DA, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-24
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.postalmuseum.org

The Postal Museum tells the story of postal communication and its impact on global society. At the museum and online we bring five centuries of extraordinary communications history to life, as seen through the eyes of the iconic postal service. On a visit, experience interactive and family-friendly permanent and temporary exhibitions, join special events and learning activities, use modern research facilities and take an immersive ride on Mail Rail, London’s secret Post Office underground railway. The Postal Museum is the public identity of the Postal Heritage Trust, an independent charity created to protect and share this rich history and heritage.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 84
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Bullock Texas State History Museum

1800 N. Congress Avenue, Austin, 78701, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.thestoryoftexas.com

The Bullock Texas State History Museum, the state's official history museum, in downtown Austin includes three floors of exhibitions, an IMAX® theater, a special-effects theater, café and museum store. Texas history galleries featuring over 500 original artifacts that span 13,000 years and a robust calendar of special exhibitions, films and programs are the Museum's hallmarks. The Bullock Museum collaborates with more than 700 museums, libraries, archives, and individuals to display original artifacts and produce exhibitions that illuminate and celebrate Texas history and culture.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 84
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-postal-museum.jpeg
The Postal Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bullock-texas-state-history-museum.jpeg
Bullock Texas State History Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Postal Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bullock Texas State History Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Postal Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bullock Texas State History Museum in 2026.

Incident History — The Postal Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Postal Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bullock Texas State History Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bullock Texas State History Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-postal-museum.jpeg
The Postal Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bullock-texas-state-history-museum.jpeg
Bullock Texas State History Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both The Postal Museum company and Bullock Texas State History Museum company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Bullock Texas State History Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Postal Museum company.

In the current year, Bullock Texas State History Museum company and The Postal Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bullock Texas State History Museum company nor The Postal Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bullock Texas State History Museum company nor The Postal Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bullock Texas State History Museum company nor The Postal Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Postal Museum company nor Bullock Texas State History Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Postal Museum nor Bullock Texas State History Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Postal Museum company nor Bullock Texas State History Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both The Postal Museum company and Bullock Texas State History Museum company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither The Postal Museum nor Bullock Texas State History Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Postal Museum nor Bullock Texas State History Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Postal Museum nor Bullock Texas State History Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Postal Museum nor Bullock Texas State History Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Postal Museum nor Bullock Texas State History Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Postal Museum nor Bullock Texas State History Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References