Comparison Overview

The Porter Law Firm, L.L.C

VS

Feldon Dunsmore Solicitors

The Porter Law Firm, L.L.C

235 Peachtree Street N.E., Atlanta, 30303, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

The Porter Law Firm, LLC is a family law firm in midtown Atlanta, Georgia specializing in all domestic relations matters including but not limited to divorce, modification suits (of custody, visitation, and/or child support), contempt actions, legitimation/paternity matters, adoptions, guardianships, and Guardian ad Litem services. The firm, which was founded in 2008, handles cases in all metropolitan-Atlanta counties, and by request throughout the state of Georgia.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Feldon Dunsmore Solicitors

Leafield Estate, Warwick, CV34 6RA, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

A niche law firm providing firms and private individuals with legal advice of a quality provided at partner level within larger firms whilst remaining competitively priced. By building long-term relationships with its clients the advice can also be tailored to suit the particular needs of that client but will always be based on providing practical solutions which facilitate the achievement of the client’s own business goals. Advice will, whenever possible, be provided at a guaranteed fixed price at the outset and to provide consistency and value for money in the fees we charge.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-porter-law-firm.jpeg
The Porter Law Firm, L.L.C
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/feldon-dunsmore-solicitors.jpeg
Feldon Dunsmore Solicitors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Porter Law Firm, L.L.C
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Feldon Dunsmore Solicitors
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Porter Law Firm, L.L.C in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Feldon Dunsmore Solicitors in 2025.

Incident History — The Porter Law Firm, L.L.C (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Porter Law Firm, L.L.C cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Feldon Dunsmore Solicitors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Feldon Dunsmore Solicitors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-porter-law-firm.jpeg
The Porter Law Firm, L.L.C
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/feldon-dunsmore-solicitors.jpeg
Feldon Dunsmore Solicitors
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Porter Law Firm, L.L.C company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Feldon Dunsmore Solicitors company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Feldon Dunsmore Solicitors company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Porter Law Firm, L.L.C company.

In the current year, Feldon Dunsmore Solicitors company and The Porter Law Firm, L.L.C company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Feldon Dunsmore Solicitors company nor The Porter Law Firm, L.L.C company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Feldon Dunsmore Solicitors company nor The Porter Law Firm, L.L.C company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Feldon Dunsmore Solicitors company nor The Porter Law Firm, L.L.C company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Porter Law Firm, L.L.C company nor Feldon Dunsmore Solicitors company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Porter Law Firm, L.L.C nor Feldon Dunsmore Solicitors holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Porter Law Firm, L.L.C company nor Feldon Dunsmore Solicitors company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Feldon Dunsmore Solicitors company employs more people globally than The Porter Law Firm, L.L.C company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither The Porter Law Firm, L.L.C nor Feldon Dunsmore Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Porter Law Firm, L.L.C nor Feldon Dunsmore Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Porter Law Firm, L.L.C nor Feldon Dunsmore Solicitors holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Porter Law Firm, L.L.C nor Feldon Dunsmore Solicitors holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Porter Law Firm, L.L.C nor Feldon Dunsmore Solicitors holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Porter Law Firm, L.L.C nor Feldon Dunsmore Solicitors holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X