Comparison Overview

TPIL Lawyers

VS

State Bar of Wisconsin

TPIL Lawyers

6 Logan Rd, Woolloongabba, Queensland, 4102, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

TPIL Lawyers provide legal services for people who want to seek compensation after being injured due to the negligence or negative acts of other people. Servicing claims all over Queensland, we offer our legal assistance on a “no win, no fee” basis. We assist victims of motor vehicle accidents, workplace accidents, and those who suffered an accident or injury while visiting a public place, such as commercial or government premises. Official Partner of the Queensland Rugby League

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

State Bar of Wisconsin

5302 Eastpark Blvd, Madison, Wisconsin, 53707-7158, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

We are a professional association for Wisconsin lawyers. The State Bar provides educational, career development, and other services to over 24,000 members. We also provide public services, including attorney referrals, public education, and reduced-fee legal assistance for low-income state residents. Our mission is to improve the administration of justice and the delivery of legal services and to promote the professional interests of Wisconsin lawyers. Disclaimer: Statements or expressions of opinion here are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the State Bar of Wisconsin, its members, sponsors, or staff. Due to the rapidly changing nature of the law, the information presented here may be outdated. The State Bar is not liable for any damages resulting from the use of this material. The publication of any advertisement is not to be construed as an endorsement of the product or service offered unless the ad specifically states that there is such endorsement or approval.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 168
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-personal-injury-lawyers.jpeg
TPIL Lawyers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-bar-of-wisconsin.jpeg
State Bar of Wisconsin
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
TPIL Lawyers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
State Bar of Wisconsin
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TPIL Lawyers in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for State Bar of Wisconsin in 2025.

Incident History — TPIL Lawyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TPIL Lawyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — State Bar of Wisconsin (X = Date, Y = Severity)

State Bar of Wisconsin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-personal-injury-lawyers.jpeg
TPIL Lawyers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-bar-of-wisconsin.jpeg
State Bar of Wisconsin
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both TPIL Lawyers company and State Bar of Wisconsin company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, State Bar of Wisconsin company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to TPIL Lawyers company.

In the current year, State Bar of Wisconsin company and TPIL Lawyers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither State Bar of Wisconsin company nor TPIL Lawyers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither State Bar of Wisconsin company nor TPIL Lawyers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither State Bar of Wisconsin company nor TPIL Lawyers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither TPIL Lawyers company nor State Bar of Wisconsin company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither TPIL Lawyers nor State Bar of Wisconsin holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

State Bar of Wisconsin company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to TPIL Lawyers company.

State Bar of Wisconsin company employs more people globally than TPIL Lawyers company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither TPIL Lawyers nor State Bar of Wisconsin holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither TPIL Lawyers nor State Bar of Wisconsin holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither TPIL Lawyers nor State Bar of Wisconsin holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither TPIL Lawyers nor State Bar of Wisconsin holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither TPIL Lawyers nor State Bar of Wisconsin holds HIPAA certification.

Neither TPIL Lawyers nor State Bar of Wisconsin holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X