Comparison Overview

The Permissions Group

VS

The New York Review of Books

The Permissions Group

60025, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21

The Permissions Group, Inc. is a copyright and permissions consulting company with more than 15 years of experience negotiating rights and permissions. Our company's goal is to provide a full range of rights-related services. We have extensive experience obtaining the rights to print material, photos, web sites, other electronic media, music and more. Please browse our web site to learn more about how The Permissions Group, Inc. can serve you.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The New York Review of Books

207 East 32nd St, New York, NY, 10016, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

With a worldwide circulation of over 135,000, The New York Review of Books has established itself, in Esquire‘s words, as “the premier literary-intellectual magazine in the English language.” The New York Review began during the New York publishing strike of 1963, when its founding editors, Robert Silvers and Barbara Epstein, and their friends, decided to create a new kind of magazine—one in which the most interesting and qualified minds of our time would discuss current books and issues in depth. Just as importantly, it was determined that the Review should be an independent publication; it began life as an independent editorial voice and it remains independent today.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
The Permissions Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-new-york-review-of-books.jpeg
The New York Review of Books
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Permissions Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The New York Review of Books
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Permissions Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The New York Review of Books in 2025.

Incident History — The Permissions Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Permissions Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The New York Review of Books (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The New York Review of Books cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
The Permissions Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-new-york-review-of-books.jpeg
The New York Review of Books
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Permissions Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The New York Review of Books company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The New York Review of Books company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Permissions Group company.

In the current year, The New York Review of Books company and The Permissions Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The New York Review of Books company nor The Permissions Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The New York Review of Books company nor The Permissions Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The New York Review of Books company nor The Permissions Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Permissions Group company nor The New York Review of Books company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Permissions Group nor The New York Review of Books holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Permissions Group company nor The New York Review of Books company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The New York Review of Books company employs more people globally than The Permissions Group company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither The Permissions Group nor The New York Review of Books holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Permissions Group nor The New York Review of Books holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Permissions Group nor The New York Review of Books holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Permissions Group nor The New York Review of Books holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Permissions Group nor The New York Review of Books holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Permissions Group nor The New York Review of Books holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.