Comparison Overview

The Pen Museum

VS

Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago

The Pen Museum

60 Frederick Street, Birmingham, England, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Making steel pen nibs in Birmingham during the Victorian era was a major industry with 129 companies employing circa 8,000 workers (mainly women). By visiting the Pen Museum, you will discover a wide range of fascinating objects and details that help tell the story of Birmingham’s pen trade and its important legacy including the link between a prominent pen manufacturer (Josiah Mason) and the establishment of the University of Birmingham. Throughout the Museum there are a range of activities for people of all ages to enjoy including writing with a quill and ink, using typewriters plus an exciting opportunity to make your own nib using the same machinery once operated by women workers in the 19th century. We still need your support. As a charity, we totally depend on our dedicated, experienced and loyal team of volunteers along with the generosity of donors and supporters. Our wonderful visitors also provide regular income to help keep this part of Birmingham’s important heritage alive. Being the world’s only museum dedicated to the history of Birmingham’s steel pen trade and its global impact, we narrate an important part of Birmingham’s industrial development. Birmingham dominated the world’s production of steel pens in the mid to late 19th century, which, had a significant impact on improving literacy on a global basis. It has been estimated that the City produced approximately three quarters of the world’s pens in the mid to late 19th century. But it is more than a museum, it’s also a place of discovery and inspiration through our displays, activities and events. Our aim is to engage and inspire visitors, provide outreach in terms of history, deliver writing skills workshops with a new focus on digitising part of our collection and archive to increase public engagement and accessibility to as wide an audience as possible.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago

Last Update: 2026-01-23

The Smart Museum of Art at the University of Chicago is a site for rigorous inquiry and exchange that encourages the examination of complex issues through the lens of art objects and artistic practice. Through strong community and scholarly partnerships, the Museum incorporates diverse ideas, identities, and experiences into its exhibitions and collections, academic initiatives, and public programming. The Smart first opened in 1974.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 54
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-pen-museum.jpeg
The Pen Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/smart-museum-of-art.jpeg
Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Pen Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Pen Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago in 2026.

Incident History — The Pen Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Pen Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-pen-museum.jpeg
The Pen Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/smart-museum-of-art.jpeg
Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Pen Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Pen Museum company.

In the current year, Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago company and The Pen Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago company nor The Pen Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago company nor The Pen Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago company nor The Pen Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Pen Museum company nor Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Pen Museum nor Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to The Pen Museum company.

Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago company employs more people globally than The Pen Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither The Pen Museum nor Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Pen Museum nor Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Pen Museum nor Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Pen Museum nor Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Pen Museum nor Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Pen Museum nor Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H