Comparison Overview

The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum

VS

Royal Alberta Museum (RAM)

The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum

10975 SW 17th St., Miami, FL, 33199, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1977, The Art Museum at Florida International University (MMC/FIU) started as a student gallery. Since then, it has grown to achieve official recognition as a major cultural institution of the State of Florida for its unprecedented collection of Latin American and 20th century American art, its innovative exhibitions that draw on or enhance the collection, and its unparalleled service to South Florida's diverse audiences. In 2003, the Art Museum at FIU was officially renamed The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum. In 1999, The Museum received accreditation from the American Association of Museums (AAM). It has assumed a central role in the FIU community and in the cultural life of South Florida as a whole through its mission to serve the broadest audience possible and to deliver all programs and services free of charge. The Frost Art Museum is also an affiliate within the Smithsonian Affiliations program.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Royal Alberta Museum (RAM)

9810 103A Ave NW, Edmonton, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-01

The Royal Alberta Museum is a monumental expression of passion for the province we call home. A place where you'll find 2.5 million uniquely Albertan stories just waiting to be told. Space rocks, live bugs, enormous dinosaurs, wildlife, and personal accounts from people who have shaped our province come together in bold exhibits. A-ha moments await around every corner.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 95
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-patricia-&-phillip-frost-art-museum.jpeg
The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-alberta-museum.jpeg
Royal Alberta Museum (RAM)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Royal Alberta Museum (RAM)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) in 2025.

Incident History — The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-patricia-&-phillip-frost-art-museum.jpeg
The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-alberta-museum.jpeg
Royal Alberta Museum (RAM)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum company.

In the current year, Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) company and The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) company nor The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) company nor The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) company nor The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum company nor Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum nor Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum company nor Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) company employs more people globally than The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum nor Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum nor Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum nor Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum nor Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum nor Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Patricia & Phillip Frost Art Museum nor Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X