Comparison Overview

The Orchid Recovery Center

VS

Executive Mental Health

The Orchid Recovery Center

2925 10th Ave N., Palm Springs, FL, 33461, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The Orchid Recovery Center is a drug and alcohol rehab facility located in South Florida that is specifically geared to the needs of women afflicted with addiction and unresolved trauma. The Orchid was founded to meet the needs of women that were not being addressed by the recovery community. The Orchid Recovery Center holds the belief that substance abuse in women has a cause, a progress and a societal perception different than that of men. Specifically women addicts are more likely to have poor self concepts of guilt and blame, and mental health problems than male addicts. Furthermore, they are more likely than men to let social stigma, labeling and guilt prevent them from seeking help. The Orchid Recovery Center's Model of recovery was created to address these differences. It provides a different experience due to its embrace of the relational growth model first espoused by Dr. Karen Dodge, its focus on trauma and its dedication to a holistic approach to recovery. The relational growth modelposesthat recovery in women is more likely to be successful when a woman is a part of a trusting, interdependent network of other women. To help women create this network, the relational growth model guides and encourages women to live, work, play and communicate with one another during the recovery process.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Executive Mental Health

11835 West Olympic Blvd, Los Angeles, 90064, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1996 by Dr. Ari Kalechstein, Executive Mental Health (EMH) is a provider of clinical psychology, psychiatry and neuropsychology services. EMH offers support for patients who experience a wide array of mental health conditions. The cornerstones of the reputation that EMH has earned within the medical community include quality of care, forging personal relationships with patients, responsiveness to individual patient needs, and a commitment to best practices when providing clinical care. Interested in working with EMH? Reach out to us at [email protected]. Looking for clinicians to support you, your family, or your facility? Write us at [email protected] EMH offers comprehensive neuropsychological evaluations and clinical psychology services in our Los Angeles outpatient clinic and has worked with over 250 acute and long-term care facilities across California and Nevada. Our group of clinicians is comprised of fellowship-trained neuropsychologists, psychiatrists, and clinical psychologists. Our goal is to assess and identify the individual needs of each patient, and to provide evidence-based, clinically-effective psychological interventions. Why Executive Mental Health? • Network: In addition to the Los Angeles home office, EMH has offered direct care to over 250 acute and skilled nursing facilities in California and Nevada. • Experience: EMH has completed over 40,000 neuropsychological evaluations and over 30,000 Telehealth sessions. • Training: Clinicians at EMH are fellowship trained, which means that they completed an intensive, two-year training program in order to earn their title. • Languages: The EMH team of clinicians can offer therapy in eleven languages, including English, Spanish, Mandarin, Taiwanese and more. • Insurance: Each of the clinicians at EMH is a Medicare-approved provider. Moreover, EMH clinicians are paneled with over 25 insurance companies.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-orchid-recovery-center.jpeg
The Orchid Recovery Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/executive-mental-health.jpeg
Executive Mental Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Orchid Recovery Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Executive Mental Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Orchid Recovery Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Executive Mental Health in 2026.

Incident History — The Orchid Recovery Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Orchid Recovery Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Executive Mental Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Executive Mental Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-orchid-recovery-center.jpeg
The Orchid Recovery Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/executive-mental-health.jpeg
Executive Mental Health
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both The Orchid Recovery Center company and Executive Mental Health company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Executive Mental Health company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Orchid Recovery Center company.

In the current year, Executive Mental Health company and The Orchid Recovery Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Executive Mental Health company nor The Orchid Recovery Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Executive Mental Health company nor The Orchid Recovery Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Executive Mental Health company nor The Orchid Recovery Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Orchid Recovery Center company nor Executive Mental Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Orchid Recovery Center nor Executive Mental Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Orchid Recovery Center company nor Executive Mental Health company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Executive Mental Health company employs more people globally than The Orchid Recovery Center company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither The Orchid Recovery Center nor Executive Mental Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Orchid Recovery Center nor Executive Mental Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Orchid Recovery Center nor Executive Mental Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Orchid Recovery Center nor Executive Mental Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Orchid Recovery Center nor Executive Mental Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Orchid Recovery Center nor Executive Mental Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N