Comparison Overview

The New Yorker

VS

Bright Red Publishing

The New Yorker

1 World Trade Center, New York, NY, 10007, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

The New Yorker is a national weekly magazine that offers a signature mix of reporting and commentary on politics, foreign affairs, business, technology, popular culture, and the arts, along with humor, fiction, poetry, and cartoons. Founded in 1925, The New Yorker publishes the best writers of its time and has received more National Magazine Awards than any other magazine, for its groundbreaking reporting, authoritative analysis, and creative inspiration. The New Yorker takes readers beyond the weekly print magazine with the web, mobile, tablet, social media, and signature events. The New Yorker is at once a classic and at the leading edge.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 1,369
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bright Red Publishing

1 Torphichen Street, Edinburgh, EH3 8HX, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Bright Red offer the brightest and freshest Study Guides for Scotland’s students and teachers! At Bright Red we are passionate about producing accessible, contemporary and engaging materials of the highest quality for Scotland‘s students and teachers. One of the ways we achieve this high quality is to work with the very best publishing and educational professionals to produce truly exceptional resources.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-new-yorker.jpeg
The New Yorker
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bright-red-publishing.jpeg
Bright Red Publishing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The New Yorker
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bright Red Publishing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The New Yorker in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bright Red Publishing in 2025.

Incident History — The New Yorker (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The New Yorker cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bright Red Publishing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bright Red Publishing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-new-yorker.jpeg
The New Yorker
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bright-red-publishing.jpeg
Bright Red Publishing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The New Yorker company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bright Red Publishing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bright Red Publishing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The New Yorker company.

In the current year, Bright Red Publishing company and The New Yorker company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bright Red Publishing company nor The New Yorker company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bright Red Publishing company nor The New Yorker company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bright Red Publishing company nor The New Yorker company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The New Yorker company nor Bright Red Publishing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The New Yorker nor Bright Red Publishing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The New Yorker company nor Bright Red Publishing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The New Yorker company employs more people globally than Bright Red Publishing company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither The New Yorker nor Bright Red Publishing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The New Yorker nor Bright Red Publishing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The New Yorker nor Bright Red Publishing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The New Yorker nor Bright Red Publishing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The New Yorker nor Bright Red Publishing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The New Yorker nor Bright Red Publishing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.