Comparison Overview

The New York Review of Books

VS

Journal of Graduate Medical Education

The New York Review of Books

207 East 32nd St, New York, NY, 10016, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

With a worldwide circulation of over 135,000, The New York Review of Books has established itself, in Esquire‘s words, as “the premier literary-intellectual magazine in the English language.” The New York Review began during the New York publishing strike of 1963, when its founding editors, Robert Silvers and Barbara Epstein, and their friends, decided to create a new kind of magazine—one in which the most interesting and qualified minds of our time would discuss current books and issues in depth. Just as importantly, it was determined that the Review should be an independent publication; it began life as an independent editorial voice and it remains independent today.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Journal of Graduate Medical Education

401 N. Michigan Avenue, Chicago, 60611, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

The Journal of Graduate Medical Education (JGME) disseminates scholarship and promotes critical inquiry to inform and engage the graduate medical education community to improve the quality of graduate medical education. It is a peer-reviewed, editorially independent journal published by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. The inaugural issue of the Journal was published in September 2009. The Journal is editorially independent, and strives for high quality scholarship and relevance. It is provided free of charge to program directors and designated institutional officials of accredited programs and institutions. Individual and institutional subscriptions are available.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-new-york-review-of-books.jpeg
The New York Review of Books
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/journal-of-graduate-medical-education.jpeg
Journal of Graduate Medical Education
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The New York Review of Books
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Journal of Graduate Medical Education
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The New York Review of Books in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Journal of Graduate Medical Education in 2025.

Incident History — The New York Review of Books (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The New York Review of Books cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Journal of Graduate Medical Education (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Journal of Graduate Medical Education cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-new-york-review-of-books.jpeg
The New York Review of Books
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/journal-of-graduate-medical-education.jpeg
Journal of Graduate Medical Education
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The New York Review of Books company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Journal of Graduate Medical Education company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Journal of Graduate Medical Education company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The New York Review of Books company.

In the current year, Journal of Graduate Medical Education company and The New York Review of Books company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Journal of Graduate Medical Education company nor The New York Review of Books company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Journal of Graduate Medical Education company nor The New York Review of Books company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Journal of Graduate Medical Education company nor The New York Review of Books company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The New York Review of Books company nor Journal of Graduate Medical Education company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The New York Review of Books nor Journal of Graduate Medical Education holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Journal of Graduate Medical Education company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to The New York Review of Books company.

The New York Review of Books company employs more people globally than Journal of Graduate Medical Education company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither The New York Review of Books nor Journal of Graduate Medical Education holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The New York Review of Books nor Journal of Graduate Medical Education holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The New York Review of Books nor Journal of Graduate Medical Education holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The New York Review of Books nor Journal of Graduate Medical Education holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The New York Review of Books nor Journal of Graduate Medical Education holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The New York Review of Books nor Journal of Graduate Medical Education holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.