Comparison Overview

The Netanya Foundation

VS

Letter Concepts

The Netanya Foundation

2 Zoran St. POB 7216, Netanya, 42172, IL
Last Update: 2025-12-20

The Netanya Foundation was established in 1989 in order to improve the quality of life of the city's residents. From the late 1980s and to this day, Netanya has absorbed over 65,000 immigrants from the Former Soviet Union , Ethiopia and other countries worldwide. Welcoming immigration with open arms, the city needed to face the challenges of integration. Creating a united community from multiple nationalities is always a challenge. However, when dealing with poorer populations and with virtually no financial support, the barriers loom even higher. This is the mission of the Netanya Foundation. We continually seek and find the resources to help our residents and build a strong community for everyone. The Netanya Foundation initiates, manages and operates cultural facilities, community services, social, health, education, sports, science, religion, charity and welfare programs.

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Letter Concepts

33 Massirio Drive, Berlin, CT, 06037, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18

Specialists in Catholic fund raising. Customized direct mail packages produced for Catholic dioceses, parishes, schools and other Catholic organizations since 1989 Letter Concepts continued growth and success speaks to the service and commitment offered to clients as we are not your typical “mail house”, providing clients with the total package; data base solutions, segmenting of records, account management, data processing of gifts and pledges and production services including printing (laser and press print capabilities) of letterhead, brochures, invitations, posters, flyers, envelopes and gift/pledge cards.

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-netanya-foundation.jpeg
The Netanya Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/letter-concepts.jpeg
Letter Concepts
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Netanya Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Letter Concepts
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Netanya Foundation in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Letter Concepts in 2025.

Incident History — The Netanya Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Netanya Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Letter Concepts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Letter Concepts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-netanya-foundation.jpeg
The Netanya Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/letter-concepts.jpeg
Letter Concepts
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Letter Concepts company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Netanya Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Letter Concepts company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Netanya Foundation company.

In the current year, Letter Concepts company and The Netanya Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Letter Concepts company nor The Netanya Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Letter Concepts company nor The Netanya Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Letter Concepts company nor The Netanya Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Netanya Foundation company nor Letter Concepts company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Netanya Foundation nor Letter Concepts holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Netanya Foundation company nor Letter Concepts company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Letter Concepts company employs more people globally than The Netanya Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Fundraising.

Neither The Netanya Foundation nor Letter Concepts holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Netanya Foundation nor Letter Concepts holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Netanya Foundation nor Letter Concepts holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Netanya Foundation nor Letter Concepts holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Netanya Foundation nor Letter Concepts holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Netanya Foundation nor Letter Concepts holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N