Comparison Overview

The Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art

VS

Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens

The Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art

4525 Oak St, Kansas City, MO, 64111, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art invites all people to explore the art in its care, and through its vast collections, the depths and complexities of human experiences. We strive to create a sense of belonging, where staff and volunteers can do meaningful work connecting people to art. We create an informed, invested group of staff and volunteers through shared values and open, direct and respectful communication. We embrace IDEAS (Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, Access and Sustainability) in every aspect of our ideals and aspirations, as we believe these values to be paramount to success. Each staff member and volunteer embodies the institution’s commitments and agrees to exhibit behaviors that align with them. We hold one another to these expectations so that, together, we may know, own, energize and sustain our culture and the institution for generations to come.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 346
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens

714 North Portage Path, Akron, Ohio, 44303, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens is the former estate of the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company co-founder F.A. Seiberling, and his family. In 1957, Stan Hywet became a non-profit historic estate museum so that the public could benefit from the cultural, educational, and inspirational riches of one of the most significant achievements in architecture and horticulture to come out of America’s Industrial Age. Open for tours April – December, Stan Hywet is accredited by the American Alliance of Museums and is Akron, Ohio’s oldest National Historic Landmark.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 68
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-nelson-atkins-museum-of-art.jpeg
The Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stan-hywet-hall-&-gardens.jpeg
Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens in 2026.

Incident History — The Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-nelson-atkins-museum-of-art.jpeg
The Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stan-hywet-hall-&-gardens.jpeg
Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art company.

In the current year, Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens company and The Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens company nor The Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens company nor The Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens company nor The Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art company nor Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art nor Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art company nor Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art company employs more people globally than Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither The Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art nor Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art nor Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art nor Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art nor Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art nor Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art nor Stan Hywet Hall & Gardens holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H