Comparison Overview

The National Museum of Animals & Society

VS

Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR)

The National Museum of Animals & Society

PO Box 26483, Los Angeles, California, 90026, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Founded in 2010, the National Museum of Animals & Society is the first museum of its kind and is dedicated to enriching the lives of animals and people by exploring our shared experience. We center of the living history of animal protection, animal studies, and humane education in our collection, exhibitions, public programming, and educational efforts. www.museumofanimals.org

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR)

2626 West Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia, 23220, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799

The Children's Museum of Richmond is a nonprofit organization with the mission to inspire growth in all children by engaging families in learning through play. Our Values: We value learning. •Children: We have respect for all children and their amazing abilities. We are passionate about the process of learning and the importance of play. We want to inspire creativity, curiosity and exploration. •Staff: We surround ourselves with trustworthy people who thrive on a team and share our energy, passion, creativity, and optimism. We learn by listening to children, families, teachers and others who support them. •Community: We seek partnerships and collaborations that benefit young children. We celebrate our community’s diversity and offer a safe place for all children to interact, play and learn.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 52
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-national-museum-of-animals-&-society.jpeg
The National Museum of Animals & Society
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/children's-museum-of-richmond.jpeg
Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The National Museum of Animals & Society
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The National Museum of Animals & Society in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) in 2026.

Incident History — The National Museum of Animals & Society (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The National Museum of Animals & Society cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-national-museum-of-animals-&-society.jpeg
The National Museum of Animals & Society
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/children's-museum-of-richmond.jpeg
Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The National Museum of Animals & Society company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The National Museum of Animals & Society company.

In the current year, Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) company and The National Museum of Animals & Society company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) company nor The National Museum of Animals & Society company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) company nor The National Museum of Animals & Society company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) company nor The National Museum of Animals & Society company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The National Museum of Animals & Society company nor Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The National Museum of Animals & Society nor Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The National Museum of Animals & Society company nor Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) company employs more people globally than The National Museum of Animals & Society company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither The National Museum of Animals & Society nor Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The National Museum of Animals & Society nor Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The National Museum of Animals & Society nor Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The National Museum of Animals & Society nor Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The National Museum of Animals & Society nor Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The National Museum of Animals & Society nor Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H