Comparison Overview

National Academies Press

VS

American Book Review

National Academies Press

undefined, Washington, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

The National Academies Press (NAP) was created by the National Academies to publish the reports issued by the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, the Institute of Medicine, and the National Research Council, all operating under a charter granted by the Congress of the United States. The NAP publishes more than 200 books a year on a wide range of topics in science, engineering, and health, capturing the most authoritative views on important issues in science and health policy. The institutions represented by the NAP are unique in that they attract the nation's leading experts in every field to serve on their award-winning panels and committees.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

American Book Review

Victoria, Texas 77901, US, Victoria, Texas 77901, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Founded in 1977, American Book Review specializes in reviews of frequently neglected published works of fiction, poetry, and literary and cultural criticism from small, regional, university, ethnic, avant-garde, and women's presses. ABR as a literary journal aims to project the sense of engagement that writers themselves feel about what is being published. It is edited and produced by writers for writers and the general public.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-national-academies-press.jpeg
National Academies Press
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-book-review.jpeg
American Book Review
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
National Academies Press
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
American Book Review
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Academies Press in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for American Book Review in 2025.

Incident History — National Academies Press (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Academies Press cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — American Book Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

American Book Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-national-academies-press.jpeg
National Academies Press
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-book-review.jpeg
American Book Review
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

American Book Review company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to National Academies Press company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, American Book Review company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to National Academies Press company.

In the current year, American Book Review company and National Academies Press company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither American Book Review company nor National Academies Press company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither American Book Review company nor National Academies Press company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither American Book Review company nor National Academies Press company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither National Academies Press company nor American Book Review company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither National Academies Press nor American Book Review holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither National Academies Press company nor American Book Review company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

National Academies Press company employs more people globally than American Book Review company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither National Academies Press nor American Book Review holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither National Academies Press nor American Book Review holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither National Academies Press nor American Book Review holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither National Academies Press nor American Book Review holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither National Academies Press nor American Book Review holds HIPAA certification.

Neither National Academies Press nor American Book Review holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.