Comparison Overview

Motley Brands LLC (dba Onekind)

VS

L'Oréal

Motley Brands LLC (dba Onekind)

1837 Hyperion Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90027, US
Last Update: 2025-03-13 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

Winner of Glamour Magazine and SELF magazine Beauty Awards. In 2010 we launched a men’s grooming brand. We won 15 industry awards, entered the shelves of Nordstrom, Neiman Marcus and Bloomingdales and then shut it all down. We decided to start over. We spent countless hours in online beauty forums and spoke to our customers. Inclusivity and a holistic approach was important from day one - gender wasn’t. We took everything we learned to launch a brand formulated to solve skincare concerns - for all. Say hello to Onekind. We went to work with veteran cosmetic chemists and aromatherapists to create power-punching formulas with ultra-hydrating, soothing botanicals and essential oils that not only restore skin damage but also calm the mind. Thousands of raving reviews later, Onekind is dedicated to crafting clean, accessible, clinical-quality solutions that are a pleasure for everyone to use. - Matt & Madison, Brother-Sister and Co-Founders

NAICS: 325
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

L'Oréal

41, Rue Martre, None, Paris, None, FR, 92110
Last Update: 2025-09-04 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

No.1 Beauty Group Worldwide. No.1 most innovative company in Europe (Fortune's ranking). We are 90K employees across 150 countries on five continents, united by our shared purpose: creating the beauty that moves the world. Our 37 international brands are divided into four unique Divisions: Luxe, Consumer Products, Dermatological Beauty, and Professional Products. This diverse portfolio includes brands like Kiehl’s, Lancôme, Giorgio Armani Beauty, Yves Saint Laurent Beauté, Ralph Lauren, Aesop, Maybelline New York, Essie, Kérastase, IT Cosmetics, Prada Beauty, Biotherm, Shu Uemura, Viktor&Rolf, Maison Margiela, Urban Decay, Redken, Vichy, La Roche-Posay, Diesel, Garnier, L’Oréal Paris, and more. For more than a century, L’Oréal has devoted itself solely to one business: beauty. We want to bring beauty to all people. Our goal is to win over another one billion consumers around the world by innovating and creating cosmetic and skincare products that meet the infinite diversity of their beauty needs and desires. That’s about us… now what about you? You are driven and up for a challenge! You’re passionate about putting your best foot forward, but you’re not afraid to fail either. You love to learn, grow and make an impact on the world. You can be an intern, or at a senior level position, we’re always looking for new people to join our teams. If you are ready to take charge of your career and join us, you’re one click away: https://careers.loreal.com/en_US/content Interested about our quest to the next billion consumers, follow us here to get the insider scoop on our business, culture, and tips on how to join us to shape the future of beauty. Freedom to go beyond, that’s the beauty of L’Oréal.

NAICS: 32562
NAICS Definition: Toilet Preparation Manufacturing
Employees: 88,983
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-motley.jpeg
Motley Brands LLC (dba Onekind)
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/loréal.jpeg
L'Oréal
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Motley Brands LLC (dba Onekind)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
L'Oréal
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Motley Brands LLC (dba Onekind) in 2025.

Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for L'Oréal in 2025.

Incident History — Motley Brands LLC (dba Onekind) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Motley Brands LLC (dba Onekind) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — L'Oréal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

L'Oréal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-motley.jpeg
Motley Brands LLC (dba Onekind)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/loréal.jpeg
L'Oréal
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

L'Oréal company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Motley Brands LLC (dba Onekind) company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, L'Oréal company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Motley Brands LLC (dba Onekind) company.

In the current year, L'Oréal company and Motley Brands LLC (dba Onekind) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither L'Oréal company nor Motley Brands LLC (dba Onekind) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither L'Oréal company nor Motley Brands LLC (dba Onekind) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither L'Oréal company nor Motley Brands LLC (dba Onekind) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Motley Brands LLC (dba Onekind) company nor L'Oréal company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

L'Oréal company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Motley Brands LLC (dba Onekind) company.

L'Oréal company employs more people globally than Motley Brands LLC (dba Onekind) company, reflecting its scale as a Personal Care Product Manufacturing.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Formbricks is an open source qualtrics alternative. Prior to version 4.0.1, Formbricks is missing JWT signature verification. This vulnerability stems from a token validation routine that only decodes JWTs (jwt.decode) without verifying their signatures. Both the email verification token login path and the password reset server action use the same validator, which does not check the token’s signature, expiration, issuer, or audience. If an attacker learns the victim’s actual user.id, they can craft an arbitrary JWT with an alg: "none" header and use it to authenticate and reset the victim’s password. This issue has been patched in version 4.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victim’s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victim’s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /consulta-dispensas. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected is an unknown function of the file /module/Api/aluno. This manipulation of the argument aluno_id causes improper authorization. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tencent WeKnora 0.1.0. This impacts the function testEmbeddingModel of the file /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test. The manipulation of the argument baseUrl results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor responds: "We have confirmed that the issue mentioned in the report does not exist in the latest releases".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X