Comparison Overview

Motley Brands LLC (dba Onekind)

VS

Clinique

Motley Brands LLC (dba Onekind)

1837 Hyperion Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90027, US
Last Update: 2025-03-13 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

Winner of Glamour Magazine and SELF magazine Beauty Awards. In 2010 we launched a menโ€™s grooming brand. We won 15 industry awards, entered the shelves of Nordstrom, Neiman Marcus and Bloomingdales and then shut it all down. We decided to start over. We spent countless hours in online beauty forums and spoke to our customers. Inclusivity and a holistic approach was important from day one - gender wasnโ€™t. We took everything we learned to launch a brand formulated to solve skincare concerns - for all. Say hello to Onekind. We went to work with veteran cosmetic chemists and aromatherapists to create power-punching formulas with ultra-hydrating, soothing botanicals and essential oils that not only restore skin damage but also calm the mind. Thousands of raving reviews later, Onekind is dedicated to crafting clean, accessible, clinical-quality solutions that are a pleasure for everyone to use. - Matt & Madison, Brother-Sister and Co-Founders

NAICS: 325
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Clinique

767 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY, 10153, US
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Clinique believes great skin can be created. Because whatever the skin concern, Clinique has safe, clinical solutions. Informed by decades of experience, working with dermatologists, scientists and ophthalmologists. Formulated with the perfect balance of ingredients for powerful efficacy with rigorous safety. Our unwavering dedication is why millions around the world trust their skin to Clinique. And have for over 55 years.

NAICS: 32562
NAICS Definition: Toilet Preparation Manufacturing
Employees: 10,257
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-motley.jpeg
Motley Brands LLC (dba Onekind)
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clinique.jpeg
Clinique
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Motley Brands LLC (dba Onekind)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Clinique
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Motley Brands LLC (dba Onekind) in 2025.

Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Clinique in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Motley Brands LLC (dba Onekind) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Motley Brands LLC (dba Onekind) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Clinique (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Clinique cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-motley.jpeg
Motley Brands LLC (dba Onekind)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clinique.jpeg
Clinique
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: External System Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Clinique company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Motley Brands LLC (dba Onekind) company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Clinique company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Motley Brands LLC (dba Onekind) company has not reported any.

In the current year, Clinique company and Motley Brands LLC (dba Onekind) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Clinique company nor Motley Brands LLC (dba Onekind) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Clinique company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Motley Brands LLC (dba Onekind) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Clinique company nor Motley Brands LLC (dba Onekind) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Motley Brands LLC (dba Onekind) company nor Clinique company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Clinique company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Motley Brands LLC (dba Onekind) company.

Clinique company employs more people globally than Motley Brands LLC (dba Onekind) company, reflecting its scale as a Personal Care Product Manufacturing.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Formbricks is an open source qualtrics alternative. Prior to version 4.0.1, Formbricks is missing JWT signature verification. This vulnerability stems from a token validation routine that only decodes JWTs (jwt.decode) without verifying their signatures. Both the email verification token login path and the password reset server action use the same validator, which does not check the tokenโ€™s signature, expiration, issuer, or audience. If an attacker learns the victimโ€™s actual user.id, they can craft an arbitrary JWT with an alg: "none" header and use it to authenticate and reset the victimโ€™s password. This issue has been patched in version 4.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victimโ€™s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victimโ€™s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /consulta-dispensas. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected is an unknown function of the file /module/Api/aluno. This manipulation of the argument aluno_id causes improper authorization. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tencent WeKnora 0.1.0. This impacts the function testEmbeddingModel of the file /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test. The manipulation of the argument baseUrl results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor responds: "We have confirmed that the issue mentioned in the report does not exist in the latest releases".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X