Comparison Overview

The Menil Collection

VS

The Mint Museum

The Menil Collection

1533 Sul Ross Street, Houston, 77006, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Philanthropists and art patrons John and Dominique de Menil established the Menil Foundation in 1954 to foster greater public understanding and appreciation of art, architecture, culture, religion, and philosophy. In 1987, the Menil Collection’s main building opened to the public. Today, the museum’s art buildings and green spaces are nestled within a residential neighborhood in central Houston. On a 30-acre campus, visitors are invited to explore the Menil’s main museum building, Menil Drawing Institute, Cy Twombly Gallery, and Dan Flavin Installation at Richmond Hall.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 106
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Mint Museum

2730 Randolph Rd, Charlotte, NC, 28207, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

Beyond the walls that display the art, that separate the collections, that house the lights and descriptions. Beyond the walls between the artist’s intentions and the visitor’s interpretations, between what you see and how you feel, between what was shared and what you’ll share with others. Beyond the walls you’ll find The Mint Museum. An internationally-renowned institution, The Mint Museum is dedicated to collecting, conserving, exhibiting, inspiring, publishing and protecting important works of art and design from all over the global art community. Our commitment to integrity, leadership and innovation intends to encourage not only the understanding of diverse peoples and cultures, but respect for the impact and influence they’ve had on each and every one of us. Through our two locations, Mint Museum Uptown and Mint Museum Randolph, we hope to stimulate the senses, ignite inner passion and compel our visitors to share the things that inspire them with the world. Just as our artists do.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 104
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-menil-collection.jpeg
The Menil Collection
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-mint-museum.jpeg
The Mint Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Menil Collection
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Mint Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Menil Collection in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Mint Museum in 2026.

Incident History — The Menil Collection (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Menil Collection cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Mint Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Mint Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-menil-collection.jpeg
The Menil Collection
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-mint-museum.jpeg
The Mint Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both The Menil Collection company and The Mint Museum company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, The Mint Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Menil Collection company.

In the current year, The Mint Museum company and The Menil Collection company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Mint Museum company nor The Menil Collection company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Mint Museum company nor The Menil Collection company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Mint Museum company nor The Menil Collection company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Menil Collection company nor The Mint Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Menil Collection nor The Mint Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Menil Collection company nor The Mint Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Menil Collection company employs more people globally than The Mint Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither The Menil Collection nor The Mint Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Menil Collection nor The Mint Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Menil Collection nor The Mint Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Menil Collection nor The Mint Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Menil Collection nor The Mint Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Menil Collection nor The Mint Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.