Comparison Overview

The Melbourne Headshot Company

VS

Kiddie Kandids

The Melbourne Headshot Company

343 Little Collins St, Melbourne, GMT +11 Hours, 3000, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://headshot.com.au/linkedin-profile-headshots-melbourne/

Australia's Favourite Corporate Portrait Studio! You are capable of looking better than you ever thought possible in a photo. That's a big statement, but it's true. We guarantee it 100% - and if you don't think we have taken the best photo you have ever had, don't pay us a cent! How do we know? Because we're the Original Headshot Company in Australia and we've photographed over 5000 people, which means we know what works and what doesn't, so we know all the SECRETS to making everyone's photos look FANTASTIC! So don't put it off any longer, take step one now and call us 03 96421656

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Kiddie Kandids

US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 800 and 849
http://www.kiddiekandids.com

Based on more than 33 years of industry experience and extensive consumer research, Kiddie Kandids strives to deliver what parents want most in a children’s portrait studio. The studios feature all-digital photography, allowing customers to instantly view all captured poses and choose their favorites right in the camera bay. All portraits are printed immediately in the studio allowing customers to go home with their portraits. Kiddie Kandids prides itself on delivering a relaxed, comfortable portrait taking setting with the best customer service available in the industry. The experience is driven by both the parent’s and children’s needs and wants. Kiddie Kandids believes a great portrait doesn’t end with a smile, but rather when a child’s personality is captured on film and a picture becomes a treasured memory.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 66
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-melbourne-headshot-company.jpeg
The Melbourne Headshot Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kiddie-kandids.jpeg
Kiddie Kandids
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Melbourne Headshot Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kiddie Kandids
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Melbourne Headshot Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kiddie Kandids in 2025.

Incident History — The Melbourne Headshot Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Melbourne Headshot Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Kiddie Kandids (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kiddie Kandids cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-melbourne-headshot-company.jpeg
The Melbourne Headshot Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kiddie-kandids.jpeg
Kiddie Kandids
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Kiddie Kandids company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Melbourne Headshot Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Kiddie Kandids company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Melbourne Headshot Company company.

In the current year, Kiddie Kandids company and The Melbourne Headshot Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Kiddie Kandids company nor The Melbourne Headshot Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Kiddie Kandids company nor The Melbourne Headshot Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Kiddie Kandids company nor The Melbourne Headshot Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Melbourne Headshot Company company nor Kiddie Kandids company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Melbourne Headshot Company nor Kiddie Kandids holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Melbourne Headshot Company company nor Kiddie Kandids company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Kiddie Kandids company employs more people globally than The Melbourne Headshot Company company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither The Melbourne Headshot Company nor Kiddie Kandids holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Melbourne Headshot Company nor Kiddie Kandids holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Melbourne Headshot Company nor Kiddie Kandids holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Melbourne Headshot Company nor Kiddie Kandids holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Melbourne Headshot Company nor Kiddie Kandids holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Melbourne Headshot Company nor Kiddie Kandids holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References