Comparison Overview

The Mediation Experts

VS

Scottish Legal Complaints Commission

The Mediation Experts

undefined, Brisbane, Queensland, 4567, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27

I am a lawyer and mediator with over 30 years experience and have conducted over 2000 mediations and 200 arbitrations. I am a nationally registered mediator and certified as a Federal Dispute Resolution Practitioner. I coach, teach and conduct workshops and seminars about mediations. Specialties: I specialize in mediations regarding Family Law, Workplace, Commercial, Construction, business, personal injury, workplace, labor and others.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Scottish Legal Complaints Commission

Capital Building, Edinburgh, EH2 2AF, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-29

The Scottish Legal Complaints Commission (SLCC) is an independent statutory body providing a single point of contact for all complaints against lawyers operating in Scotland. We manage complaints that relate to the service provided by lawyers – offering resolution and providing redress where appropriate We refer complaints about the personal conduct of lawyers to the ‘relevant professional organisation’ (e.g. the Law Society of Scotland, the Faculty of Advocates). We give advice on complaints to all parties and issue guidance and encourage best practice in complaint handling and issues that lead to complaints. We monitor practice and publish trend reports – to help ensure the sector learns from complaints made. See our Social Media principles here - https://www.scottishlegalcomplaints.org.uk/contact-us/our-social-media-principles/

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 51
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-mediation-experts.jpeg
The Mediation Experts
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Mediation Experts
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Scottish Legal Complaints Commission
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Mediation Experts in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Scottish Legal Complaints Commission in 2025.

Incident History — The Mediation Experts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Mediation Experts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Scottish Legal Complaints Commission (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Scottish Legal Complaints Commission cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-mediation-experts.jpeg
The Mediation Experts
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scottish-legal-complaints-commission.jpeg
Scottish Legal Complaints Commission
Incidents

FAQ

Scottish Legal Complaints Commission company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Mediation Experts company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Scottish Legal Complaints Commission company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Mediation Experts company.

In the current year, Scottish Legal Complaints Commission company and The Mediation Experts company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Scottish Legal Complaints Commission company nor The Mediation Experts company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Scottish Legal Complaints Commission company nor The Mediation Experts company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Scottish Legal Complaints Commission company nor The Mediation Experts company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Mediation Experts company nor Scottish Legal Complaints Commission company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Mediation Experts nor Scottish Legal Complaints Commission holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Mediation Experts company nor Scottish Legal Complaints Commission company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Scottish Legal Complaints Commission company employs more people globally than The Mediation Experts company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither The Mediation Experts nor Scottish Legal Complaints Commission holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Mediation Experts nor Scottish Legal Complaints Commission holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Mediation Experts nor Scottish Legal Complaints Commission holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Mediation Experts nor Scottish Legal Complaints Commission holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Mediation Experts nor Scottish Legal Complaints Commission holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Mediation Experts nor Scottish Legal Complaints Commission holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X