Comparison Overview

The Mediation Centre

VS

Gilson Daub

The Mediation Centre

undefined, Penrith, undefined, 2750, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28

The Mediation Centre is Western Sydney’s specialist mediation service provider, headed by Amanda Little Mediator, Family Dispute Resolution Practitioner and Solicitor. We provide services to Western Sydney and surrounds. At The Mediation Centre our trained Mediators provide alternative dispute resolution services in many areas of law including: • Family Law; Children’s, Property and Child Support Disputes. We are also registered Family Dispute Resolution Practitioners and can issue the required s.60I Certificates.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Gilson Daub

31910 Del Obispo Street Suite 100, San Juan Capistrano , CA, 92675, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Gilson Daub specializes in workers compensation defense throughout California, Nevada, Kansas and Missouri. With offices in San Diego, Orange County, Inland Empire, Los Angeles, West Los Angeles, San Fernando Valley, San Luis Obispo, San Jose, Fresno, Sacramento, and San Francisco, Oakland, Las Vegas and Kansas City. Gilson Daub attorneys have defended workers compensation cases in every Workers Compensation Board of Appeals in the State of California, Nevada, Kansas and Missouri. They are familiar with the unique preferences and ideologies of the judges, medical providers and Agreed Medical Examiners throughout the state and will use that knowledge to speed your cases to favorable resolutions.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 101
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-mediation-centre.jpeg
The Mediation Centre
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gilson-daub-inc-.jpeg
Gilson Daub
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Mediation Centre
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gilson Daub
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Mediation Centre in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gilson Daub in 2025.

Incident History — The Mediation Centre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Mediation Centre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gilson Daub (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gilson Daub cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-mediation-centre.jpeg
The Mediation Centre
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gilson-daub-inc-.jpeg
Gilson Daub
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gilson Daub company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Mediation Centre company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Gilson Daub company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Mediation Centre company.

In the current year, Gilson Daub company and The Mediation Centre company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gilson Daub company nor The Mediation Centre company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gilson Daub company nor The Mediation Centre company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gilson Daub company nor The Mediation Centre company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Mediation Centre company nor Gilson Daub company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Mediation Centre nor Gilson Daub holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Mediation Centre company nor Gilson Daub company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Gilson Daub company employs more people globally than The Mediation Centre company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither The Mediation Centre nor Gilson Daub holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Mediation Centre nor Gilson Daub holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Mediation Centre nor Gilson Daub holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Mediation Centre nor Gilson Daub holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Mediation Centre nor Gilson Daub holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Mediation Centre nor Gilson Daub holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X