Comparison Overview

The MECCA Group, LLC

VS

Thriving Minds Behavioral Health

The MECCA Group, LLC

1001 Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, 20036, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21

Founded in 2006, The MECCA Group is comprised of a clinically and culturally diverse team of professionals who provide comprehensive psychological, rehabilitative, and educational services for children, adolescents, young adults, and their support systems in the Washington, DC Metropolitan area. Our dedicated team consists of clinicians in the fields of psychology, social work, counseling, behavior management and analysis, speech-language pathology, occupational therapy, vocational education, and special education. All professional team members have extensive knowledge and experience in providing evidence-based practices as well as comprehensive holistic care to help all clients reach their highest potential and to live fully. The partners of The MECCA Group are Mercedes E. Ebanks, PhD and Keisha L. Mack, PhD.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Thriving Minds Behavioral Health

None
Last Update: 2025-11-13

Thriving Minds Behavioral Health offers expert assessment and intervention for childhood developmental and learning issues. We specialize in anxiety, including Selective Mutism, social anxiety, Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, generalized anxiety, and specific phobias. Thriving Minds Behavioral Health clinicians use Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) in conjunction with parent coaching and school interventions to help families reach their mental health goals. We have many years of experience working with individuals and families to identify strengths and weaknesses, develop an action plan, and empower families to make the changes necessary to lead a full, successful life. Psychological treatment is never easy, but it can make a world of difference in your or your child's future.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-mecca-group-llc.jpeg
The MECCA Group, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thriving-minds-behavioral-health.jpeg
Thriving Minds Behavioral Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The MECCA Group, LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Thriving Minds Behavioral Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The MECCA Group, LLC in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Thriving Minds Behavioral Health in 2026.

Incident History — The MECCA Group, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The MECCA Group, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Thriving Minds Behavioral Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Thriving Minds Behavioral Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-mecca-group-llc.jpeg
The MECCA Group, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thriving-minds-behavioral-health.jpeg
Thriving Minds Behavioral Health
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Thriving Minds Behavioral Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The MECCA Group, LLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Thriving Minds Behavioral Health company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The MECCA Group, LLC company.

In the current year, Thriving Minds Behavioral Health company and The MECCA Group, LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Thriving Minds Behavioral Health company nor The MECCA Group, LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Thriving Minds Behavioral Health company nor The MECCA Group, LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Thriving Minds Behavioral Health company nor The MECCA Group, LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The MECCA Group, LLC company nor Thriving Minds Behavioral Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The MECCA Group, LLC nor Thriving Minds Behavioral Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The MECCA Group, LLC company nor Thriving Minds Behavioral Health company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Thriving Minds Behavioral Health company employs more people globally than The MECCA Group, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither The MECCA Group, LLC nor Thriving Minds Behavioral Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The MECCA Group, LLC nor Thriving Minds Behavioral Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The MECCA Group, LLC nor Thriving Minds Behavioral Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The MECCA Group, LLC nor Thriving Minds Behavioral Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The MECCA Group, LLC nor Thriving Minds Behavioral Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The MECCA Group, LLC nor Thriving Minds Behavioral Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N