Comparison Overview

The Max Group

VS

Block

The Max Group

Max House 1,, Dr. Jha Marg, Okhla Phase III, New Delhi, Delhi, IN, 110020
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
www.maxindia.com

Max Group is a $7 billion diversified Indian conglomerate founded by Mr. Analjit Singh with a strong presence across Senior Care, Life Insurance, and Real Estate. Guided by a purpose-driven approach, we aim to create meaningful solutions that improve lives and deliver lasting value. Max India Limited: Redefining Senior Care Max India is dedicated to addressing the evolving needs of India’s ageing population. Through its offerings, Antara Senior Living, Antara Assisted Care Services, and Antara AGEasy, Max India provides progressive, trusted solutions rooted in Sevabhav (service), excellence, and integrity. Max Estates Limited: Spaces That Inspire Max Estates develops sustainable, grade-A developments in Delhi-NCR. that balance thoughtful design, sustainability, and performance. Every project is crafted to enhance productivity, foster collaboration, and elevate lifestyles. Max Financial Services Limited: Securing Future Focused on Life Insurance, MFSL actively manages Axis Max Life Insurance Company Limited, India's largest non-bank, private life insurance company. A Joint Venture between Max Financial Services Limited and Axis Bank Limited, Axis Max Life Insurance offers comprehensive and long-term savings life insurance solutions. Across all its businesses, Max Group is guided by its core values of excellence, credibility, and helpfulness. These principles shape how we operate and engage with our stakeholders, inspiring us to consistently do what’s right while upholding the highest standards of transparency and governance. Mission: To be the most preferred choice in our industries To lead with quality, innovation, and reputation To build enduring relationships based on respect and trust At Max Group, we believe success lies in creating businesses that deliver both economic value and social good. Together, we’re shaping a future where doing good and doing well go hand in hand.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 30,534
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Block

Oakland, California, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 700 and 749
https://block.xyz/

Block is one company built from many blocks, all united by the same purpose of economic empowerment. The blocks that form our foundational teams — People, Finance, Counsel, Hardware, Information Security, Platform Infrastructure Engineering, and more — provide support and guidance at the corporate level. They work across business groups and around the globe, spanning time zones and disciplines to develop inclusive People policies, forecast finances, give legal counsel, safeguard systems, nurture new initiatives, and more. Every challenge creates possibilities, and we need different perspectives to see them all. Bring yours to Block.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 13,182
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-max-group.jpeg
The Max Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/joinblock.jpeg
Block
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Max Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Block
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Max Group in 2026.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Block in 2026.

Incident History — The Max Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Max Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Block (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Block cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-max-group.jpeg
The Max Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/joinblock.jpeg
Block
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Insider Threat (former employee)
Motivation: Financial Gain (alleged by shareholders), Unauthorized Data Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

The Max Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Block company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Block company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas The Max Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, Block company and The Max Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Block company nor The Max Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Block company has disclosed at least one data breach, while The Max Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Block company nor The Max Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Max Group company nor Block company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Max Group nor Block holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Max Group company nor Block company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Max Group company employs more people globally than Block company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither The Max Group nor Block holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Max Group nor Block holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Max Group nor Block holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Max Group nor Block holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Max Group nor Block holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Max Group nor Block holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g.,  execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References