Comparison Overview

The Max Group

VS

Capital Group

The Max Group

Max House 1,, Dr. Jha Marg, Okhla Phase III, New Delhi, Delhi, IN, 110020
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Max Group is a $7 billion diversified Indian conglomerate founded by Mr. Analjit Singh with a strong presence across Senior Care, Life Insurance, and Real Estate. Guided by a purpose-driven approach, we aim to create meaningful solutions that improve lives and deliver lasting value. Max India Limited: Redefining Senior Care Max India is dedicated to addressing the evolving needs of India’s ageing population. Through its offerings, Antara Senior Living, Antara Assisted Care Services, and Antara AGEasy, Max India provides progressive, trusted solutions rooted in Sevabhav (service), excellence, and integrity. Max Estates Limited: Spaces That Inspire Max Estates develops sustainable, grade-A developments in Delhi-NCR. that balance thoughtful design, sustainability, and performance. Every project is crafted to enhance productivity, foster collaboration, and elevate lifestyles. Max Financial Services Limited: Securing Future Focused on Life Insurance, MFSL actively manages Axis Max Life Insurance Company Limited, India's largest non-bank, private life insurance company. A Joint Venture between Max Financial Services Limited and Axis Bank Limited, Axis Max Life Insurance offers comprehensive and long-term savings life insurance solutions. Across all its businesses, Max Group is guided by its core values of excellence, credibility, and helpfulness. These principles shape how we operate and engage with our stakeholders, inspiring us to consistently do what’s right while upholding the highest standards of transparency and governance. Mission: To be the most preferred choice in our industries To lead with quality, innovation, and reputation To build enduring relationships based on respect and trust At Max Group, we believe success lies in creating businesses that deliver both economic value and social good. Together, we’re shaping a future where doing good and doing well go hand in hand.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 30,534
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Capital Group

333 South Hope Street, None, Los Angeles, CA, US, 90071
Last Update: 2025-11-20

Capital Group was established in 1931 in Los Angeles, California, and now has 31 offices around the globe. For over 90 years we've provided carefully researched investment solutions and services to financial professionals. *** We've been made aware of an employment scam fraudulently using Capital Group's name. Please note: Capital Group currently does not offer 100% remote work positions. On average, the interview process can take one to three months to go from resume submission to offer. Financial transactions are never part of the job on boarding process. For your own cyber safety and security, if you suspect fraud, please do not respond to or interact with messages claiming to be from Capital Group. You can also contact [email protected] to verify a job opportunity.*** This content is published by Capital Group, home of American Funds Distributors, Inc. which will be renamed Capital Client Group, Inc. on or around July 1, 2024. For important legal information please click the company details website link: https://www.capitalgroup.com/us/landing-pages/linkedin-terms-of-use.html

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 10,374
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-max-group.jpeg
The Max Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capital-group.jpeg
Capital Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Max Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Capital Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Max Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Capital Group in 2025.

Incident History — The Max Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Max Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Capital Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Capital Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-max-group.jpeg
The Max Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capital-group.jpeg
Capital Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Capital Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Max Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Capital Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Max Group company.

In the current year, Capital Group company and The Max Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Capital Group company nor The Max Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Capital Group company nor The Max Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Capital Group company nor The Max Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Max Group company nor Capital Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Max Group nor Capital Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Capital Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to The Max Group company.

The Max Group company employs more people globally than Capital Group company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither The Max Group nor Capital Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Max Group nor Capital Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Max Group nor Capital Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Max Group nor Capital Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Max Group nor Capital Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Max Group nor Capital Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H