Comparison Overview

The Marker Group

VS

Queen City Court Reporting

The Marker Group

13105 North West Freeway, Suite 300, Houston, Texas, US, 77040
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 700 and 749

Founded in 1985, the Marker Group is the nation’s most trusted name in record collection, medical review, data analysis, and many other litigation support services. We are a certified Women’s Business Enterprise that helps the world’s most prestigious defense law firms win cases with records and analysis they can rely on, every time.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 178
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Queen City Court Reporting

P.O. Box 33364, Charlotte, North Carolina, 28233, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

A Charlotte Firm Specializing in Accuracy, Dependability, and Timeliness. We're on the Case! Covering Both North and South Carolina The seasoned court reporters at Queen City Court Reporting strive to be the ultimate solution for all of your deposition and litigation needs. Based in Charlotte, North Carolina, our court reporters have over 50 years combined experience. We bring a broad knowledge base and will work our very hardest to deliver accuracy, professionalism, and timeliness in every single job we take. Our court reporters serve Charlotte and the surrounding areas of North and South Carolina. We at Queen City Court Reporting pride ourselves on really getting to know our clients so that we can tailor each job to fit their individual needs. We understand the importance of quality court reporting services and will work closely with you to make sure that your experience is a success from start to finish. Reporting of: Depositions Hearings Conventions Arbitrations Meetings Conferences Federal Grand Jury Trials Expertise in: Medical Securities Construction Environmental Asbestos Patent/Trademark Family Law Litigation Support: Compressed Transcripts/Keyword Indexing E-transcripts Videotaping of: Depositions/Day-in-the-Life-of/Accident Scene/Evidence Video Conferencing Video Synchronization to Transcript ASCII Diskettes Rough ASCIIs of Testimony Transcription of Audio Recordings

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-marker-group.jpeg
The Marker Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/queen-city-court-reporting.jpeg
Queen City Court Reporting
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Marker Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Queen City Court Reporting
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Marker Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Queen City Court Reporting in 2025.

Incident History — The Marker Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Marker Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Queen City Court Reporting (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Queen City Court Reporting cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-marker-group.jpeg
The Marker Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/queen-city-court-reporting.jpeg
Queen City Court Reporting
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Queen City Court Reporting company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Marker Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

The Marker Group company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Queen City Court Reporting company has not reported any.

In the current year, Queen City Court Reporting company and The Marker Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Queen City Court Reporting company nor The Marker Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

The Marker Group company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Queen City Court Reporting company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Queen City Court Reporting company nor The Marker Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Marker Group company nor Queen City Court Reporting company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Marker Group nor Queen City Court Reporting holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Marker Group company nor Queen City Court Reporting company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Marker Group company employs more people globally than Queen City Court Reporting company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither The Marker Group nor Queen City Court Reporting holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Marker Group nor Queen City Court Reporting holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Marker Group nor Queen City Court Reporting holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Marker Group nor Queen City Court Reporting holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Marker Group nor Queen City Court Reporting holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Marker Group nor Queen City Court Reporting holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X