Comparison Overview

The Maple Press Company

VS

Mepco Label Systems

The Maple Press Company

480 Willow Springs Ln, York, Pennsylvania, 17406, US
Last Update: 2025-12-14
Between 750 and 799

Since 1901, Maple Press has proudly crafted books that have entertained and educated readers. Our book manufacturing operations are located in York, PA where over 13 million books are produced annually in a wide variety of trim sizes and bind styles. Our combination of offset and digital presses gives Maple Press the flexibility to handle a complete spectrum of quantities using the most cost-effective platform. Our book manufacturing capabilities are complemented by our Maple Logistics Solutions division which provides distribution services at our facilities in York, Lebanon and Mount Joy, Pennsylvania. Together, our four facilities provide complete book manufacturing and distribution services to our customers.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 58
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Mepco Label Systems

1313 S. Stockton Street, Lodi, CA, 95240, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

Mepco Label Systems production capabilities are based on customer needs. If a customer makes a request for a new product, Mepco will create a new process to get the job done. Mepco is committed to the protection of the environment while at the same time delivering the highest quality and most cost effective production output. We work closely with not only our customers but also with our suppliers to increase our production and our capabilities. Mepco operates under an integrated production and distribution system made possible by our total in-house production and graphics facility. Mepco label systems have been located in Stockton, California since 1912, and just recently relocated to a larger facility in Lodi, CA. We perform every facet of the manufacturing process with the latest in Hi-tech equipment. Our graphics department utilizes a specialized flexo printing software for proofing and color separation. We have color scanners and proofing printers as well as color separation equipment. All of our digital plates are manufactured on the premises with environmentally safe processes and equipment. In keeping with our stated goal of TOTAL CUSTOMER SATISFACTION, it is Mepco's mission to provide customers with the highest level of service, quality, and competitive rates. Mepco strives to increase the quality of a customer's product while increasing product value.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 45
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-maple-press-company.jpeg
The Maple Press Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mepco-label-systems.jpeg
Mepco Label Systems
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Maple Press Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mepco Label Systems
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Maple Press Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mepco Label Systems in 2025.

Incident History — The Maple Press Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Maple Press Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mepco Label Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mepco Label Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-maple-press-company.jpeg
The Maple Press Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mepco-label-systems.jpeg
Mepco Label Systems
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Maple Press Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mepco Label Systems company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Mepco Label Systems company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Maple Press Company company.

In the current year, Mepco Label Systems company and The Maple Press Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mepco Label Systems company nor The Maple Press Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mepco Label Systems company nor The Maple Press Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mepco Label Systems company nor The Maple Press Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Maple Press Company company nor Mepco Label Systems company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Maple Press Company nor Mepco Label Systems holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Maple Press Company company nor Mepco Label Systems company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Maple Press Company company employs more people globally than Mepco Label Systems company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither The Maple Press Company nor Mepco Label Systems holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Maple Press Company nor Mepco Label Systems holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Maple Press Company nor Mepco Label Systems holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Maple Press Company nor Mepco Label Systems holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Maple Press Company nor Mepco Label Systems holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Maple Press Company nor Mepco Label Systems holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L