Comparison Overview

The Ligature

VS

Reed & Witting

The Ligature

4909 Alcoa Avenue, Los Angeles, CA, 90058, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

The Ligature is a leader in print communications. We provide eco-friendly options and cost efficient solutions to maximize your purchasing dollars. Since 1920 we have been partnering with Fortune 1000 corporations, Law Firms, Financial Institutions, Design firms, Fashion and Hospitality industries and Professional service firms to manage their brands. We’re skilled at maintaining brand consistency from Chicago to Beijing. We execute the print, distribute and manage the inventory of stationery, marketing items and other printing needs. We offer our clients a customizable web ordering site to simplify the procurement of their printing needs and provide them the reporting tools necessary to help them manage their budgets. The Ligature - Features • Secure, Customizable Web Ordering System • Online Product Catalog • Immediate Online Generated Proofs • Automated Order Approval • Maintains Brand Consistency • Foreign Translation Available • Web-based Job Tracking and Order History • Manage Purchasing Activities • Reporting, Database Management, Budget Control • Downloadable Excel reports • Inventory Control & Management • Custom Electronic Invoicing and Credit Card Billing Let The Ligature team be your reliable print partner.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 49
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Reed & Witting

2900 Sassafras Way, Pittsburgh, PA, 15201, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

We’re Your Perfect Print Partner! Making your life easier by designing valuable print solutions! As one of the oldest and best printing companies in Pittsburgh, Reed & Witting is an industry-leading commercial printer, offering both traditional and digital presses, as well as superwide format printing and fulfillment services. Our A-1 professionals thrive on custom solutions to give your project the extra attention you are looking for. We start with your vision and optimize our expertise for your benefit. We listen. We learn. We are honest. We innovatively partner with our clients and our vendors to excel. Period. passion. precision. print.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-ligature.jpeg
The Ligature
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reed-&-witting-company.jpeg
Reed & Witting
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Ligature
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Reed & Witting
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Ligature in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Reed & Witting in 2025.

Incident History — The Ligature (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Ligature cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Reed & Witting (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Reed & Witting cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-ligature.jpeg
The Ligature
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2018
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reed-&-witting-company.jpeg
Reed & Witting
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both The Ligature company and Reed & Witting company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

The Ligature company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Reed & Witting company has not reported any.

In the current year, Reed & Witting company and The Ligature company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Reed & Witting company nor The Ligature company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

The Ligature company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Reed & Witting company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Reed & Witting company nor The Ligature company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Ligature company nor Reed & Witting company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Ligature nor Reed & Witting holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

The Ligature company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Reed & Witting company.

Both The Ligature company and Reed & Witting company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither The Ligature nor Reed & Witting holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Ligature nor Reed & Witting holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Ligature nor Reed & Witting holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Ligature nor Reed & Witting holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Ligature nor Reed & Witting holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Ligature nor Reed & Witting holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L