Comparison Overview

The Legal Paige

VS

De Koning Vergouwen Advocaten

The Legal Paige

Missoula Ave, Missoula, Montana, 59802, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Meet The Legal Paige Paige is the founder of The Legal Paige, a virtual legal educational platform working with small businesses. She is a certified Juris Doctor and holds a double B.A. in Economics and Political Science. After working as a federal law clerk, Paige traded in the traditional law life for a virtual one and opened the doors to The Legal Paige in 2018. She helps her clients and online community run legal and protected businesses through her contract shop, podcast, YouTube channel, and blog. Her mission is to create an online space where the law isn’t so scary and entrepreneurs can get legally legit in no time. Law aside, Paige is a Montana mom who loves hiking, lake time, and a good game of Catan. Meet The Legal Paige… ounded in 2018 by small business attorney, Paige Griffith, The Legal Paige is a leading legal education platform and contract template shop for online small business owners. Created with the mission to equip entrepreneurs with easy-to-use contracts and legal tools- The Legal Paige has served almost 10,000 customers, expanded to multiple industries, grown to over 300 products,and offers over 400 legal resources. The Legal Paige blog, podcasts, and Youtube channel are well-known for thorough answers + hot takes on important legal topics. Top notch customer service, complimentary updates to contract templates, and a knack for simplifying even the most complicated concepts set The Legal Paige apart as a true champion for entrepreneurs.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

De Koning Vergouwen Advocaten

Sophialaan 33, Amsterdam, 1075 BL, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Wij zijn de advocaten van De Koning Vergouwen Advocaten. Waarom kiezen voor ons? Omdat u graag vertrouwen heeft. In een raadsman met een ruime blik. In een kantoor zonder poespas. Ons advocatenkantoor is in 1985 opgericht door Jan de Koning. Hij begon zijn praktijk op drie hoog achter, met één dossier, één antwoordapparaat en een flinke dosis moed. Inmiddels bestaat ons kantoor uit een kleine veertig medewerkers en staan wij duizenden cliënten bij in ons statige pand aan het Amsterdamse Vondelpark.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/de-koning-vergouwen-advocaten.jpeg
De Koning Vergouwen Advocaten
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Legal Paige
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
De Koning Vergouwen Advocaten
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Legal Paige in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for De Koning Vergouwen Advocaten in 2025.

Incident History — The Legal Paige (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Legal Paige cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — De Koning Vergouwen Advocaten (X = Date, Y = Severity)

De Koning Vergouwen Advocaten cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-legal-paige.jpeg
The Legal Paige
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/de-koning-vergouwen-advocaten.jpeg
De Koning Vergouwen Advocaten
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Legal Paige company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to De Koning Vergouwen Advocaten company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, De Koning Vergouwen Advocaten company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Legal Paige company.

In the current year, De Koning Vergouwen Advocaten company and The Legal Paige company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither De Koning Vergouwen Advocaten company nor The Legal Paige company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither De Koning Vergouwen Advocaten company nor The Legal Paige company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither De Koning Vergouwen Advocaten company nor The Legal Paige company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Legal Paige company nor De Koning Vergouwen Advocaten company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Legal Paige nor De Koning Vergouwen Advocaten holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Legal Paige company nor De Koning Vergouwen Advocaten company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

De Koning Vergouwen Advocaten company employs more people globally than The Legal Paige company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither The Legal Paige nor De Koning Vergouwen Advocaten holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Legal Paige nor De Koning Vergouwen Advocaten holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Legal Paige nor De Koning Vergouwen Advocaten holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Legal Paige nor De Koning Vergouwen Advocaten holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Legal Paige nor De Koning Vergouwen Advocaten holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Legal Paige nor De Koning Vergouwen Advocaten holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X