Comparison Overview

The Legal 500 Jobs

VS

IpHorgan Ltd.

The Legal 500 Jobs

188 Fleet Street, None, London, London, GB, EC4A 2AG
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

For 30 years, The Legal 500 series has been analysing the capabilities of law firms across the world, with a comprehensive research programme revised and updated every year to bring the most up-to-date vision of the global legal market. Our dedicated jobs service unites the world's largest legal research audience with recruiters seeking to place their roles in front of discerning, sophisticated jobseekers.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

IpHorgan Ltd.

1130 Lake Cook Road, Buffalo Grove, IL, 60089, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

IpHorgan Ltd. protects the brands, expressions, ideas, innovations and inventions that define the world’s greatest companies, products and services. We provide expertise on trademarks, patents, domain names, copyrights and trade secrets. We deliver prosecution, maintenance, enforcement and licensing services that are efficient and effective. IpHorgan assists businesses that create and nurture excellence, and safeguards the consumers that depend on them. The clients that look to us are often leaders in their industries or are determined to become leaders. They are usually international in scale and operate with a global perspective. From us they expect and receive services that are responsive, insightful and highly cost-efficient. We provide our clients with fast straight-forward service that is world-class. Our mission is to become the finest law firm in the world.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iphorgan-ltd..jpeg
IpHorgan Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Legal 500 Jobs
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
IpHorgan Ltd.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Legal 500 Jobs in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IpHorgan Ltd. in 2025.

Incident History — The Legal 500 Jobs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Legal 500 Jobs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — IpHorgan Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IpHorgan Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-legal-500-jobs.jpeg
The Legal 500 Jobs
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iphorgan-ltd..jpeg
IpHorgan Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both The Legal 500 Jobs company and IpHorgan Ltd. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, IpHorgan Ltd. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Legal 500 Jobs company.

In the current year, IpHorgan Ltd. company and The Legal 500 Jobs company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither IpHorgan Ltd. company nor The Legal 500 Jobs company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither IpHorgan Ltd. company nor The Legal 500 Jobs company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither IpHorgan Ltd. company nor The Legal 500 Jobs company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Legal 500 Jobs company nor IpHorgan Ltd. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Legal 500 Jobs nor IpHorgan Ltd. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Legal 500 Jobs company nor IpHorgan Ltd. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither The Legal 500 Jobs nor IpHorgan Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Legal 500 Jobs nor IpHorgan Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Legal 500 Jobs nor IpHorgan Ltd. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Legal 500 Jobs nor IpHorgan Ltd. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Legal 500 Jobs nor IpHorgan Ltd. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Legal 500 Jobs nor IpHorgan Ltd. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X