Comparison Overview

The Learning Forum

VS

Transparency International Georgia

The Learning Forum

New York, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.thelearningforum.org

A trusted network of senior leaders ready to share insights and experiences. The Learning Forum (TLF) Executive Council Network is a member-driven research and networking organization for senior executives of large multinational and government organizations. TLF member firms include over 300 organizations which include 5 of the Fortune 10, 25 of the Fortune 100​, ​along with 10 key government organizations. The Executive Councils span a variety of disciplines to help leaders become more competitive in their field. ✨ Stay Informed on industry trends and discuss practical applications. ✨ Instant benchmarking with trusted peers in a confidential setting. ✨ Gain inspiration from the brightest minds to help shape your own thought leadership! The council roundtables enable senior executives to learn directly from each other in small, face-to face​, confidential settings. Members learn how leading organizations outdistance their competition by tapping into their ​peers’​ experiences to develop and share tools and practices that help get work done. Visit the Learning Forum site ​(​http://thelearningforum.org/) ​for the most current meeting schedules and locations. "People in your network should challenge your thinking and connect you to new resources. Our Council has done that time and time again and I am a big fan of The Learning Forum community." “Discussions with my peers provide a valuable practitioner’s point of view and help cut through all the noise.” “Our virtual roundtable conversations continue to provide deeper insight while uncovering new areas of opportunity.” “There is a unique level of trust so that real sharing happens. Members tap into each other’s experiences and practices.” “The Learning Forum has a gift for structuring and facilitating meetings, but not over-structuring them. The right people are assembled to create an environment in which connections and learning occur."

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Transparency International Georgia

61, Agmashenebeli Ave, Tbilisi, GE, 0102
Last Update: 2025-12-04
Between 700 and 749
http://transparency.ge/en

Transparency International Georgia (TI Georgia) is a local non-governmental organization committed to combating corruption in Georgia through the promotion of transparency and accountability. Our mission is to serve as the primary source of information on corruption reform in Georgia, to assist the government and the broader public in facilitating reform in sectors where corruption exists, to build and strengthen institutions and to promote good governance. In recent years, TI Georgia has become Georgia's leading advocacy-based think tank. TI Georgia is a member of the Transparency International (TI) movement, the only global non-governmental organization devoted to combating corruption. It brings together civil society, business, and governments in a powerful global coalition. TI, through its International Secretariat and more than 90 independent national chapters around the world, works to stem both the supply and demand of corruption at the local, national, and international levels.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-learning-forum.jpeg
The Learning Forum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transparency-international-georgia.jpeg
Transparency International Georgia
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Learning Forum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Transparency International Georgia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Learning Forum in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Transparency International Georgia in 2025.

Incident History — The Learning Forum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Learning Forum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Transparency International Georgia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transparency International Georgia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-learning-forum.jpeg
The Learning Forum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transparency-international-georgia.jpeg
Transparency International Georgia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Transparency International Georgia company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Learning Forum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Transparency International Georgia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Learning Forum company.

In the current year, Transparency International Georgia company and The Learning Forum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Transparency International Georgia company nor The Learning Forum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Transparency International Georgia company nor The Learning Forum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Transparency International Georgia company nor The Learning Forum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Learning Forum company nor Transparency International Georgia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Learning Forum nor Transparency International Georgia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Learning Forum company nor Transparency International Georgia company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Transparency International Georgia company employs more people globally than The Learning Forum company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither The Learning Forum nor Transparency International Georgia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Learning Forum nor Transparency International Georgia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Learning Forum nor Transparency International Georgia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Learning Forum nor Transparency International Georgia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Learning Forum nor Transparency International Georgia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Learning Forum nor Transparency International Georgia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Published
Date
2025-12-04
Updated
Date
2025-12-04
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Published
Date
2025-12-04
Updated
Date
2025-12-04
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Published
Date
2025-12-04
Updated
Date
2025-12-04
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Published
Date
2025-12-04
Updated
Date
2025-12-04
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Published
Date
2025-12-04
Updated
Date
2025-12-04
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References