Comparison Overview

The Law Office of Samuel & Stein

VS

CRAWFORD Legal

The Law Office of Samuel & Stein

38 West 32nd Street, Suite 1110, New York, NY, 10001, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

We are a New York City law firm conveniently located around the corner from the Empire State Building, but we represent clients across the metropolitan area, including in New Jersey. Our services: * The firm is actively involved in a wide variety of employment, intellectual property, personal injury, collections, and business litigation. * Represent employers and employees in class actions involving alleged overtime and minimum wage violations under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York and New Jersey law. * Provide invaluable intellectual property guidance to small and midsize companies. * Litigate against drivers and landowners whose negligence cause serious injuries to unsuspecting victims. * Pursue debtors who owe clients thousands of dollars in commercial receivables.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CRAWFORD Legal

Level 1, 139 Frome Street, Adelaide, SA, 5000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Trusted Advisors in Corporate, Commercial and Construction Law. With a proven track record of providing high quality, cost-effective legal services, we engage and work with individuals and businesses in all sectors. From start-ups to publicly listed companies, we assist with local, national and international matters. We have a first-hand understanding of the day to day challenges faced by our clients and their businesses, built from our significant and varied experience acting as trusted advisors to our clients. For more about the Crawford Legal, please visit our website www.crawfordlegal.com.au.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-law-office-of-samuel-&-stein.jpeg
The Law Office of Samuel & Stein
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Law Office of Samuel & Stein
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CRAWFORD Legal
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Law Office of Samuel & Stein in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CRAWFORD Legal in 2025.

Incident History — The Law Office of Samuel & Stein (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Law Office of Samuel & Stein cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CRAWFORD Legal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CRAWFORD Legal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-law-office-of-samuel-&-stein.jpeg
The Law Office of Samuel & Stein
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crawford-legal.jpeg
CRAWFORD Legal
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Law Office of Samuel & Stein company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CRAWFORD Legal company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CRAWFORD Legal company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Law Office of Samuel & Stein company.

In the current year, CRAWFORD Legal company and The Law Office of Samuel & Stein company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CRAWFORD Legal company nor The Law Office of Samuel & Stein company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CRAWFORD Legal company nor The Law Office of Samuel & Stein company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CRAWFORD Legal company nor The Law Office of Samuel & Stein company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Law Office of Samuel & Stein company nor CRAWFORD Legal company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Law Office of Samuel & Stein nor CRAWFORD Legal holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Law Office of Samuel & Stein company nor CRAWFORD Legal company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CRAWFORD Legal company employs more people globally than The Law Office of Samuel & Stein company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither The Law Office of Samuel & Stein nor CRAWFORD Legal holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Law Office of Samuel & Stein nor CRAWFORD Legal holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Law Office of Samuel & Stein nor CRAWFORD Legal holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Law Office of Samuel & Stein nor CRAWFORD Legal holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Law Office of Samuel & Stein nor CRAWFORD Legal holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Law Office of Samuel & Stein nor CRAWFORD Legal holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X