Comparison Overview

Zeidman & Carpenter PLLC

VS

The Practical Lawyer

Zeidman & Carpenter PLLC

4711 Golf Rd., Skokie , Illinois, 60076, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Zeidman & Carpenter is a premier boutique law firm committed to providing exceptional representation, litigation, and transactional services, tailored and personalized to each client’s needs. Our experience is combined with innovative thinking and problem solving to provide a modern approach to today’s legal needs. Our firm embraces technology as a tool to help us serve clients more efficiently.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Practical Lawyer

188 Fleet Street, None, London, England, GB, None
Last Update: 2025-11-28

The purpose of The Practical Lawyer is simple: to keep solicitors in touch with the latest developments in each area of the law. The beauty of The Practical Lawyer is that we do the reading for you. The result is a digest that you can rely on. It is a quick and easy way of making sure you know what’s going on in your specialist area of activity. And you can use our integrated CPD programme. It is convenient, easy to use, and excellent value! https://www.practicallawyer.co.uk/ The Wills & Trusts Law Reports (WTLR) is the only set of law reports specifically for the trusts and probate practitioner. Overseen by an editorial board bringing together some of the profession’s leading practitioners, each edition provides up-to-date judgments for key cases in the sector, accompanied by case notes written by barristers. https://lawjournals.co.uk/

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-law-office-of-jade-carpenter.jpeg
Zeidman & Carpenter PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/legalease-law-journals.jpeg
The Practical Lawyer
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Zeidman & Carpenter PLLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Practical Lawyer
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zeidman & Carpenter PLLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Practical Lawyer in 2025.

Incident History — Zeidman & Carpenter PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zeidman & Carpenter PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Practical Lawyer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Practical Lawyer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-law-office-of-jade-carpenter.jpeg
Zeidman & Carpenter PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/legalease-law-journals.jpeg
The Practical Lawyer
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Practical Lawyer company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Zeidman & Carpenter PLLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Practical Lawyer company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Zeidman & Carpenter PLLC company.

In the current year, The Practical Lawyer company and Zeidman & Carpenter PLLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Practical Lawyer company nor Zeidman & Carpenter PLLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Practical Lawyer company nor Zeidman & Carpenter PLLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Practical Lawyer company nor Zeidman & Carpenter PLLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Zeidman & Carpenter PLLC company nor The Practical Lawyer company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Zeidman & Carpenter PLLC nor The Practical Lawyer holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Zeidman & Carpenter PLLC company nor The Practical Lawyer company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Zeidman & Carpenter PLLC nor The Practical Lawyer holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Zeidman & Carpenter PLLC nor The Practical Lawyer holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Zeidman & Carpenter PLLC nor The Practical Lawyer holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Zeidman & Carpenter PLLC nor The Practical Lawyer holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Zeidman & Carpenter PLLC nor The Practical Lawyer holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Zeidman & Carpenter PLLC nor The Practical Lawyer holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X