Comparison Overview

The Last Tuesday Society & Viktor Wynd Museum of Curiosities

VS

Singapore Art Museum

The Last Tuesday Society & Viktor Wynd Museum of Curiosities

11 Mare Street, London, undefined, E8 4RP, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The Viktor Wynd Museum of Curiosities presents the first all encompassing museum to open in London since the Horniman in 1901. The Museum will present an incoherent vision of the world displayed through wonder enclosed within a tiny space, no attempt is made at classification and comprehensiveness, instead the museum focuses on the pre-enlightenment origins of the museum as Wunderkabinett – a mirror to a world so suffused with miracles and beauty that any attempt at categorization is bound to fail. Where contemporary museumology hides 90% of a collection, attempts to educate and explain, to put the world into neat little labeled drawers dictated by an obscurantist elite establishment that has shown itself in error many time over the centuries & is obsessed with a pedantic overspecialization of so called "knowledge"​ that means little or nothing to anyone outside it's narrow little field & oft discredited metanarratives this museum will merely display everything that has glittered & caught the eye of it's founder – from rare priceless marvels of the natural and scientific worlds like Dodo Bones or speculum to the intriguing beauty of McDonald's Happy Meal Toys, from old master etchings to prison inmates & mad women's doodles, occultists paintings and pop art prints, the horrors and wonders of nature, two headed kittens and living coral. By placing the rare and the beautiful on the same plane as the commonplace, banal & amusing this museum seeks not to educate but to subvert, to show the world not in a grain of sand, but in a Hackney basement. East London's Most Curious Cocktail Bar: Hidden within the wonderfully strange, beautiful and bizarre world of Viktor Wynd's Museum of Curiosities, The Last Tuesday Society provides a drinking experience like no other. With a rotating menu of eclectically curated cocktails, each drink is inspired by the marvel and oddities of our venue's decor.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Singapore Art Museum

39 Keppel Road, #01-02 Tanjong Pagar Distripark, Singapore, 089065, SG
Last Update: 2026-01-09

Singapore Art Museum opened in 1996 as the first art museum in Singapore. Also known as SAM, we present contemporary art from a Southeast Asian perspective for artists, art lovers and the art curious in multiple venues across the island, including a new venue in the historic port area of Tanjong Pagar. SAM is building one of the world's most important public collections of Southeast Asian contemporary art, with the aim of connecting the art and the artists to the public and future generations through exhibitions and programmes. SAM is working towards a humane and sustainable future by committing to responsible practices within its processes. For more information, visit www.singaporeartmuseum.sg.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 114
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-last-tuesday-society-&-viktor-wynd-museum-of-curiosities.jpeg
The Last Tuesday Society & Viktor Wynd Museum of Curiosities
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/singapore-art-museum.jpeg
Singapore Art Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Last Tuesday Society & Viktor Wynd Museum of Curiosities
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Singapore Art Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Last Tuesday Society & Viktor Wynd Museum of Curiosities in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Singapore Art Museum in 2026.

Incident History — The Last Tuesday Society & Viktor Wynd Museum of Curiosities (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Last Tuesday Society & Viktor Wynd Museum of Curiosities cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Singapore Art Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Singapore Art Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-last-tuesday-society-&-viktor-wynd-museum-of-curiosities.jpeg
The Last Tuesday Society & Viktor Wynd Museum of Curiosities
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/singapore-art-museum.jpeg
Singapore Art Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Singapore Art Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Last Tuesday Society & Viktor Wynd Museum of Curiosities company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Singapore Art Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Last Tuesday Society & Viktor Wynd Museum of Curiosities company.

In the current year, Singapore Art Museum company and The Last Tuesday Society & Viktor Wynd Museum of Curiosities company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Singapore Art Museum company nor The Last Tuesday Society & Viktor Wynd Museum of Curiosities company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Singapore Art Museum company nor The Last Tuesday Society & Viktor Wynd Museum of Curiosities company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Singapore Art Museum company nor The Last Tuesday Society & Viktor Wynd Museum of Curiosities company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Last Tuesday Society & Viktor Wynd Museum of Curiosities company nor Singapore Art Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Last Tuesday Society & Viktor Wynd Museum of Curiosities nor Singapore Art Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Last Tuesday Society & Viktor Wynd Museum of Curiosities company nor Singapore Art Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Singapore Art Museum company employs more people globally than The Last Tuesday Society & Viktor Wynd Museum of Curiosities company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither The Last Tuesday Society & Viktor Wynd Museum of Curiosities nor Singapore Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Last Tuesday Society & Viktor Wynd Museum of Curiosities nor Singapore Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Last Tuesday Society & Viktor Wynd Museum of Curiosities nor Singapore Art Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Last Tuesday Society & Viktor Wynd Museum of Curiosities nor Singapore Art Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Last Tuesday Society & Viktor Wynd Museum of Curiosities nor Singapore Art Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Last Tuesday Society & Viktor Wynd Museum of Curiosities nor Singapore Art Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N