Comparison Overview

The Labrador Group, LLC

VS

PILC-Tchad

The Labrador Group, LLC

undefined, Boise, Idaho, 83702, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Founded on integrity and focused solely on the success of our clients. The Labrador Group, LLC, is an Idaho based government affairs and public policy firm solving problems and delivering results at the state and federal level. We bring our skills, experience, expertise, strategic thinking, and years of building relationships to help you achieve your goals.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

PILC-Tchad

None
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 700 and 749

Le PILC, Centre Juridique d'intérêt Public est une association de droit tchadien à but non lucratif et apolitique créé en 2006. Le PILC a pour mission de s'attaquer aux causes fondamentales des violations des Droits Humains au Tchad en favorisant l'accès des personnes démunies, particulièrement les femmes et les enfants aux voies de recours judiciaires et non judiciaires et promouvant la démocratie et le citoyenneté.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-labrador-group-llc.jpeg
The Labrador Group, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pilc-tchad.jpeg
PILC-Tchad
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Labrador Group, LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PILC-Tchad
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Labrador Group, LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PILC-Tchad in 2025.

Incident History — The Labrador Group, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Labrador Group, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PILC-Tchad (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PILC-Tchad cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-labrador-group-llc.jpeg
The Labrador Group, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pilc-tchad.jpeg
PILC-Tchad
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PILC-Tchad company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Labrador Group, LLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, PILC-Tchad company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Labrador Group, LLC company.

In the current year, PILC-Tchad company and The Labrador Group, LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PILC-Tchad company nor The Labrador Group, LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PILC-Tchad company nor The Labrador Group, LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PILC-Tchad company nor The Labrador Group, LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Labrador Group, LLC company nor PILC-Tchad company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Labrador Group, LLC nor PILC-Tchad holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Labrador Group, LLC company nor PILC-Tchad company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

PILC-Tchad company employs more people globally than The Labrador Group, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither The Labrador Group, LLC nor PILC-Tchad holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Labrador Group, LLC nor PILC-Tchad holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Labrador Group, LLC nor PILC-Tchad holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Labrador Group, LLC nor PILC-Tchad holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Labrador Group, LLC nor PILC-Tchad holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Labrador Group, LLC nor PILC-Tchad holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H