Comparison Overview

The Labrador Group, LLC

VS

Breast Cancer Action

The Labrador Group, LLC

undefined, Boise, Idaho, 83702, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.labradorgrp.com

Founded on integrity and focused solely on the success of our clients. The Labrador Group, LLC, is an Idaho based government affairs and public policy firm solving problems and delivering results at the state and federal level. We bring our skills, experience, expertise, strategic thinking, and years of building relationships to help you achieve your goals.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Breast Cancer Action

657 Mission St., Ste. 302, San Francisco, CA, 94105, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 700 and 749
http://www.bcaction.org

Breast Cancer Action (BCAction) is a national grassroots education and advocacy organization. Our mission is to achieve health justice for all women at risk of and living with breast cancer. As the watchdog of the breast cancer movement, we educate, organize, and take action for systemic change in three areas: -Breast Cancer Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment -Root Causes of Breast Cancer -Pink Ribbon Marketing and Culture BCAction believes that breast cancer is a social justice issue and a public health crisis. Individual action alone, whether in terms of lifestyle or behavioral choices, is not sufficient to tackle the root causes of the breast cancer epidemic. We focus on systemic interventions that will address the root causes of the disease and produce broad public health benefits. These benefits will ensure that fewer women develop breast cancer and die from breast cancer and no community bears a disproportionate burden of diagnosis or death from this disease. As a matter of policy, we do not accept funding from any company that profits from or contributes to the cause of cancer. This policy allows us to always put patients before profits.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-labrador-group-llc.jpeg
The Labrador Group, LLC
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/breast-cancer-action.jpeg
Breast Cancer Action
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Labrador Group, LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Breast Cancer Action
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Labrador Group, LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Breast Cancer Action in 2025.

Incident History — The Labrador Group, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Labrador Group, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Breast Cancer Action (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Breast Cancer Action cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-labrador-group-llc.jpeg
The Labrador Group, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/breast-cancer-action.jpeg
Breast Cancer Action
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Labrador Group, LLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Breast Cancer Action company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Breast Cancer Action company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Labrador Group, LLC company.

In the current year, Breast Cancer Action company and The Labrador Group, LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Breast Cancer Action company nor The Labrador Group, LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Breast Cancer Action company nor The Labrador Group, LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Breast Cancer Action company nor The Labrador Group, LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Labrador Group, LLC company nor Breast Cancer Action company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Labrador Group, LLC nor Breast Cancer Action holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Labrador Group, LLC company nor Breast Cancer Action company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Breast Cancer Action company employs more people globally than The Labrador Group, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither The Labrador Group, LLC nor Breast Cancer Action holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Labrador Group, LLC nor Breast Cancer Action holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Labrador Group, LLC nor Breast Cancer Action holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Labrador Group, LLC nor Breast Cancer Action holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Labrador Group, LLC nor Breast Cancer Action holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Labrador Group, LLC nor Breast Cancer Action holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References