Comparison Overview

UC Berkeley Labor Occupational Health Program

VS

Eastern Health Authority

UC Berkeley Labor Occupational Health Program

2199 Addison Street, Berkeley, CA, 94720, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The Labor Occupational Health Program (LOHP) educates and empowers workers and communities to take an active role in making workplaces safe, healthy, dignified, and just. LOHP is a public service program of the Center for Occupational and Environmental Health (COEH) at UC Berkeley’s School of Public Health. For over 40 years, LOHP has worked to prevent illness and injury in the workplace and raise awareness of the social and economic costs of hazardous workplace conditions on individuals, businesses, communities, and the environment. We are committed to serving the needs of those workers and communities most at risk – low-wage workers, immigrant workers, youth, workers with disabilities and communities of color – in California, nationally, and internationally. We work with unions, labor/management groups, community organizations, worker centers, small businesses, schools, academia, government agencies, and the general public. In addition to hands-on training, LOHP provides technical assistance, develops educational materials, conducts participatory research, consults on the development of workplace standards and policies, and plays an integral role in the academic mission of COEH by facilitating interaction and learning among researchers, students, and the community.

NAICS: 92312
NAICS Definition: Administration of Public Health Programs
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Eastern Health Authority

101 Payneham Rd, St Peters, South Australia, AU, 5069
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Eastern Health Authority (EHA) has a proud history of promoting and enforcing public health standards in Adelaide’s eastern and inner northern suburbs. Continuing in the tradition of the East Torrens Council Board, which operated from 1899, to the present day regional subsidiary protecting the health and wellbeing of about 160,000 residents plus visitors, EHA is an example of council shared service delivery at its very best. Established under the Local Government Act (1999), we work across our Constituent Councils to improve public and environmental health standards. City of Burnside Campbelltown City Council City of Norwood Payneham and St Peters City of Prospect Town of Walkerville Our role covers vital public and environment health services such as immunisation, hygiene and sanitation control, licensing and monitoring of Supported Residential Facilities (SRFs); and inspection and regulation of food outlets. With a single focus, and highly specialised and experienced staff, EHA is well-equipped to deal with the increasing diversity and complexity of public and environmental health.

NAICS: 92312
NAICS Definition: Administration of Public Health Programs
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-labor-occupational-health-program.jpeg
UC Berkeley Labor Occupational Health Program
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eastern-health-authority.jpeg
Eastern Health Authority
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
UC Berkeley Labor Occupational Health Program
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Eastern Health Authority
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Health Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UC Berkeley Labor Occupational Health Program in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Health Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eastern Health Authority in 2025.

Incident History — UC Berkeley Labor Occupational Health Program (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UC Berkeley Labor Occupational Health Program cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Eastern Health Authority (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eastern Health Authority cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-labor-occupational-health-program.jpeg
UC Berkeley Labor Occupational Health Program
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eastern-health-authority.jpeg
Eastern Health Authority
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Eastern Health Authority company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to UC Berkeley Labor Occupational Health Program company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Eastern Health Authority company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to UC Berkeley Labor Occupational Health Program company.

In the current year, Eastern Health Authority company and UC Berkeley Labor Occupational Health Program company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Eastern Health Authority company nor UC Berkeley Labor Occupational Health Program company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Eastern Health Authority company nor UC Berkeley Labor Occupational Health Program company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Eastern Health Authority company nor UC Berkeley Labor Occupational Health Program company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither UC Berkeley Labor Occupational Health Program company nor Eastern Health Authority company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither UC Berkeley Labor Occupational Health Program nor Eastern Health Authority holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither UC Berkeley Labor Occupational Health Program company nor Eastern Health Authority company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both UC Berkeley Labor Occupational Health Program company and Eastern Health Authority company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither UC Berkeley Labor Occupational Health Program nor Eastern Health Authority holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither UC Berkeley Labor Occupational Health Program nor Eastern Health Authority holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither UC Berkeley Labor Occupational Health Program nor Eastern Health Authority holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither UC Berkeley Labor Occupational Health Program nor Eastern Health Authority holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither UC Berkeley Labor Occupational Health Program nor Eastern Health Authority holds HIPAA certification.

Neither UC Berkeley Labor Occupational Health Program nor Eastern Health Authority holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H