Comparison Overview

The L Magazine

VS

Prestel Publishing

The L Magazine

US
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 800 and 849

The L Magazine is dedicated to uncovering emerging culture in Brooklyn and the rest of NYC. Music and art, film and food, news and neighborhoods... from rooftop gardens in Bushwick to empanada carts in Red Hook; from DIY rock shows in Williamsburg to nightlife tastemakers in downtown clubs, lives in New York. If it’s new, we will find it; if it’s good, we will tell you about it. Our freely distributed publication is a vital resource for: Event recommendations Cultural trendspotting Local neighborhood reporting

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Prestel Publishing

Neumarkter Straße 28, Munich, 81673, DE
Last Update: 2025-11-22

With its impressive list of titles in English and German, Prestel Publishing is one of the world's leading publishers in the fields of art, architecture, photography, design, cultural history, and ethnography. The company, founded in 1924, has its headquarters in Munich, offices in London, and an international sales network. Prestel is one of the world's leading illustrated book publishers with a stunning list of beautifully crafted books on all aspects of art, architecture, photography and design. From the latest street art and fashion to major exhibition catalogues, Prestel ensures that quality reigns throughout everything they publish. Prestel is the publisher for art lovers, designers and those with an eye for beauty - young and old alike, Prestel appeals to all those with a passion for visual culture. Since the very beginning, Prestel has emphasized quality. This has won the company wide recognition and numerous awards in the publishing world.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
The L Magazine
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prestel-publishing.jpeg
Prestel Publishing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The L Magazine
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Prestel Publishing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The L Magazine in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prestel Publishing in 2025.

Incident History — The L Magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The L Magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Prestel Publishing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prestel Publishing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
The L Magazine
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prestel-publishing.jpeg
Prestel Publishing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The L Magazine company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Prestel Publishing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Prestel Publishing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The L Magazine company.

In the current year, Prestel Publishing company and The L Magazine company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Prestel Publishing company nor The L Magazine company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Prestel Publishing company nor The L Magazine company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Prestel Publishing company nor The L Magazine company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The L Magazine company nor Prestel Publishing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The L Magazine nor Prestel Publishing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The L Magazine company nor Prestel Publishing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Prestel Publishing company employs more people globally than The L Magazine company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither The L Magazine nor Prestel Publishing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The L Magazine nor Prestel Publishing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The L Magazine nor Prestel Publishing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The L Magazine nor Prestel Publishing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The L Magazine nor Prestel Publishing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The L Magazine nor Prestel Publishing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.