Comparison Overview

The King's Fund

VS

CEA Tech

The King's Fund

11-13 Cavendish Square, London, LONDON, W1G 0AN, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

The King’s Fund is an independent charity working to improve health and care in England. We help to shape policy and practice through research and analysis; develop individuals, teams and organisations; promote understanding of the health and social care system; and bring people together to learn, share knowledge and debate. Our vision is that the best possible care is available to all.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 232
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CEA Tech

17 avenue des Martyrs, Grenoble, 38000, FR
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

At CEA Tech we feel strongly that technology research is a crucial component of both innovation and value creation. It is this belief that has driven our successful technology development activities over the past 50 years. CEA Tech is the CEA’s (the French Atomic Energy and Alternative Energy Commission) technology research unit. CEA Tech’s three labs—Leti, Liten, and List—develop a broad portfolio of technologies for ICTs, energy, and healthcare. CEA Tech leverages a unique innovation-driven culture and unrivalled expertise to develop and disseminate new technologies for industry, effectively bridging the gap between the worlds of research and business. CEA Tech also provides businesses with access to Key Enabling Technologies developed by other CEA operating divisions.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 204
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-king's-fund.jpeg
The King's Fund
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cea-tech.jpeg
CEA Tech
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The King's Fund
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CEA Tech
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The King's Fund in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CEA Tech in 2025.

Incident History — The King's Fund (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The King's Fund cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CEA Tech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CEA Tech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-king's-fund.jpeg
The King's Fund
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cea-tech.jpeg
CEA Tech
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The King's Fund company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CEA Tech company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CEA Tech company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The King's Fund company.

In the current year, CEA Tech company and The King's Fund company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CEA Tech company nor The King's Fund company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CEA Tech company nor The King's Fund company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CEA Tech company nor The King's Fund company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The King's Fund company nor CEA Tech company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The King's Fund nor CEA Tech holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

CEA Tech company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to The King's Fund company.

The King's Fund company employs more people globally than CEA Tech company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither The King's Fund nor CEA Tech holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The King's Fund nor CEA Tech holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The King's Fund nor CEA Tech holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The King's Fund nor CEA Tech holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The King's Fund nor CEA Tech holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The King's Fund nor CEA Tech holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X