Comparison Overview

The King's Fund

VS

BICOM: Britain Israel Communications & Research Centre

The King's Fund

11-13 Cavendish Square, London, LONDON, W1G 0AN, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

The King’s Fund is an independent charity working to improve health and care in England. We help to shape policy and practice through research and analysis; develop individuals, teams and organisations; promote understanding of the health and social care system; and bring people together to learn, share knowledge and debate. Our vision is that the best possible care is available to all.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 232
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

BICOM: Britain Israel Communications & Research Centre

None
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 700 and 749

BICOM, the Britain Israel Communications & Research Centre, is an independent British research centre producing analysis, insight and commentary to promote a greater understanding of Israel and the Middle East in the UK. We believe in the right of the State of Israel to live in peace and security, just as we believe in the rights of the Palestinians to statehood. We support a close relationship between Britain and Israel, based on shared values and interests.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-king's-fund.jpeg
The King's Fund
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bicom-britain-israel-communications-&-research-centre.jpeg
BICOM: Britain Israel Communications & Research Centre
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The King's Fund
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BICOM: Britain Israel Communications & Research Centre
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The King's Fund in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BICOM: Britain Israel Communications & Research Centre in 2025.

Incident History — The King's Fund (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The King's Fund cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BICOM: Britain Israel Communications & Research Centre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BICOM: Britain Israel Communications & Research Centre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-king's-fund.jpeg
The King's Fund
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bicom-britain-israel-communications-&-research-centre.jpeg
BICOM: Britain Israel Communications & Research Centre
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The King's Fund company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BICOM: Britain Israel Communications & Research Centre company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, BICOM: Britain Israel Communications & Research Centre company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The King's Fund company.

In the current year, BICOM: Britain Israel Communications & Research Centre company and The King's Fund company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BICOM: Britain Israel Communications & Research Centre company nor The King's Fund company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither BICOM: Britain Israel Communications & Research Centre company nor The King's Fund company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BICOM: Britain Israel Communications & Research Centre company nor The King's Fund company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The King's Fund company nor BICOM: Britain Israel Communications & Research Centre company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The King's Fund nor BICOM: Britain Israel Communications & Research Centre holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The King's Fund company nor BICOM: Britain Israel Communications & Research Centre company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The King's Fund company employs more people globally than BICOM: Britain Israel Communications & Research Centre company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither The King's Fund nor BICOM: Britain Israel Communications & Research Centre holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The King's Fund nor BICOM: Britain Israel Communications & Research Centre holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The King's Fund nor BICOM: Britain Israel Communications & Research Centre holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The King's Fund nor BICOM: Britain Israel Communications & Research Centre holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The King's Fund nor BICOM: Britain Israel Communications & Research Centre holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The King's Fund nor BICOM: Britain Israel Communications & Research Centre holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X