Comparison Overview

The Kind Design

VS

Concreet geeft vorm

The Kind Design

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Quick Design Service ~ Print and Online ~ Creative, award winning Graphic Designer with more than 14 years of experience in marketing, online and print design. I'm passionate about using excellent design to attract the desired demographic; I would love to create high-end designs for YOU: online, magazines or newspaper, as well as brochures, flyers and posters.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Concreet geeft vorm

Bergstraat 25, Amersfoort, 3811NE, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Concreet geeft vorm is van oorsprong een echt identiteitsbureau. Daar ligt onze specialiteit. Met gevoel voor vormgeving maar ook met beide benen op de grond. In die zin zijn wij een echt concreet bureau dat krachtige merken ontwikkelt die passen bij de aard en dienstverlening van de klant. Concreet geeft vorm is lid van de Beroepsorganisatie Nederlandse Ontwerpers (BNO) www.concreetgeeftvorm.nl - 033 465 23 74 - [email protected]

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-kind-design.jpeg
The Kind Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/concreet-geeft-vorm.jpeg
Concreet geeft vorm
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Kind Design
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Concreet geeft vorm
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Kind Design in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Concreet geeft vorm in 2025.

Incident History — The Kind Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Kind Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Concreet geeft vorm (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Concreet geeft vorm cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-kind-design.jpeg
The Kind Design
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/concreet-geeft-vorm.jpeg
Concreet geeft vorm
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Kind Design company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Concreet geeft vorm company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Concreet geeft vorm company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Kind Design company.

In the current year, Concreet geeft vorm company and The Kind Design company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Concreet geeft vorm company nor The Kind Design company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Concreet geeft vorm company nor The Kind Design company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Concreet geeft vorm company nor The Kind Design company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Kind Design company nor Concreet geeft vorm company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Kind Design nor Concreet geeft vorm holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Kind Design company nor Concreet geeft vorm company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Concreet geeft vorm company employs more people globally than The Kind Design company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither The Kind Design nor Concreet geeft vorm holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Kind Design nor Concreet geeft vorm holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Kind Design nor Concreet geeft vorm holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Kind Design nor Concreet geeft vorm holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Kind Design nor Concreet geeft vorm holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Kind Design nor Concreet geeft vorm holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X