Comparison Overview

The John H. Jackson Moot Court Competition

VS

Dentons Rodyk

The John H. Jackson Moot Court Competition

Last Update: 2024-07-20 (UTC)

The John H. Jackson Moot Court is an international competition with rounds on five continents gathering students from the entire globe to practice WTO Law in front of a panel of experts.

NAICS: 54111
NAICS Definition: Offices of Lawyers
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Dentons Rodyk

UOB Plaza 1 #33-00 Singapore, 048624, SG
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)
Between 750 and 799

Trusted since 1861, Dentons Rodyk is Singapore's global law firm with a team of more than 200 lawyers offering clients a full suite of legal services necessary to do business locally and globally. We regularly represent a diverse clientele across a broad spectrum of industries and practice areas. Consistently ranked highly in leading publications, we pride ourselves on providing the highest quality advice to our clients while maintaining strong working relationships with key public sector agencies and leading organisations in the private sector. Our combination with global law firm Dentons, a leader on the Acritas Global Elite Law Firm Brand Index, created the dominant global law firm in the Pacific Rim with over 85 offices in the region. With 10,000 lawyers serving 78 countries, the Firm offers clients the benefit of quality experience in and of the communities in which they want to do business or resolve a dispute—from Canada and the United States, across Europe, the United Kingdom, the Middle East and Africa, and throughout the Asia Pacific region. We are also part of Dentons ASEAN, the first global pan-ASEAN law firm with an established history in Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore and Vietnam. We will continue to grow our presence through combinations with exceptional local firms across the ASEAN region and help clients navigate change wherever they are located.

NAICS: 54111
NAICS Definition: Offices of Lawyers
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-john-h-jackson-moot-court-competition.jpeg
The John H. Jackson Moot Court Competition
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dentons-rodyk.jpeg
Dentons Rodyk
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The John H. Jackson Moot Court Competition
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Dentons Rodyk
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Law Practice Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The John H. Jackson Moot Court Competition in 2025.

Incidents vs Law Practice Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dentons Rodyk in 2025.

Incident History — The John H. Jackson Moot Court Competition (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The John H. Jackson Moot Court Competition cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Dentons Rodyk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dentons Rodyk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-john-h-jackson-moot-court-competition.jpeg
The John H. Jackson Moot Court Competition
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dentons-rodyk.jpeg
Dentons Rodyk
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Dentons Rodyk company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The John H. Jackson Moot Court Competition company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Dentons Rodyk company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The John H. Jackson Moot Court Competition company.

In the current year, Dentons Rodyk company and The John H. Jackson Moot Court Competition company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Dentons Rodyk company nor The John H. Jackson Moot Court Competition company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Dentons Rodyk company nor The John H. Jackson Moot Court Competition company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Dentons Rodyk company nor The John H. Jackson Moot Court Competition company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The John H. Jackson Moot Court Competition company nor Dentons Rodyk company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The John H. Jackson Moot Court Competition nor Dentons Rodyk holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The John H. Jackson Moot Court Competition company nor Dentons Rodyk company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The John H. Jackson Moot Court Competition company employs more people globally than Dentons Rodyk company, reflecting its scale as a Law Practice.

Neither The John H. Jackson Moot Court Competition nor Dentons Rodyk holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The John H. Jackson Moot Court Competition nor Dentons Rodyk holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The John H. Jackson Moot Court Competition nor Dentons Rodyk holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The John H. Jackson Moot Court Competition nor Dentons Rodyk holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The John H. Jackson Moot Court Competition nor Dentons Rodyk holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The John H. Jackson Moot Court Competition nor Dentons Rodyk holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Deck Mate 1 executes firmware directly from an external EEPROM without verifying authenticity or integrity. An attacker with physical access can replace or reflash the EEPROM to run arbitrary code that persists across reboots. Because this design predates modern secure-boot or signed-update mechanisms, affected systems should be physically protected or retired from service. The vendor has not indicated that firmware updates are available for this legacy model.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Deck Mate 2 lacks a verified secure-boot chain and runtime integrity validation for its controller and display modules. Without cryptographic boot verification, an attacker with physical access can modify or replace the bootloader, kernel, or filesystem and gain persistent code execution on reboot. This weakness allows long-term firmware tampering that survives power cycles. The vendor indicates that more recent firmware updates strengthen update-chain integrity and disable physical update ports to mitigate related attack avenues.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Deck Mate 2's firmware update mechanism accepts packages without cryptographic signature verification, encrypts them with a single hard-coded AES key shared across devices, and uses a truncated HMAC for integrity validation. Attackers with access to the update interface - typically via the unit's USB update port - can craft or modify firmware packages to execute arbitrary code as root, allowing persistent compromise of the device's integrity and deck randomization process. Physical or on-premises access remains the most likely attack path, though network-exposed or telemetry-enabled deployments could theoretically allow remote exploitation if misconfigured. The vendor confirmed that firmware updates have been issued to correct these update-chain weaknesses and that USB update access has been disabled on affected units.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS bc-fips on All (API modules), Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. Bouncy Castle for Java LTS bcprov-lts8on on All (API modules) allows Excessive Allocation. This vulnerability is associated with program files core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/fips/AESNativeCFB.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/fips/AESNativeGCM.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/fips/SHA256NativeDigest.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/fips/AESNativeEngine.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/fips/AESNativeCBC.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/fips/AESNativeCTR.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/engines/AESNativeCFB.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/engines/AESNativeGCM.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/engines/AESNativeEngine.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/engines/AESNativeCBC.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/engines/AESNativeGCMSIV.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/engines/AESNativeCCM.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/engines/AESNativeCTR.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/digests/SHA256NativeDigest.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/digests/SHA224NativeDigest.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/digests/SHA3NativeDigest.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/digests/SHAKENativeDigest.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/digests/SHA512NativeDigest.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/digests/SHA384NativeDigest.Java. This issue affects Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS: from 2.1.0 through 2.1.1; Bouncy Castle for Java LTS: from 2.73.0 through 2.73.7.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:P/AU:N/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber
Description

Wasmtime is a runtime for WebAssembly. In versions from 38.0.0 to before 38.0.3, the implementation of component-model related host-to-wasm trampolines in Wasmtime contained a bug where it's possible to carefully craft a component, which when called in a specific way, would crash the host with a segfault or assert failure. Wasmtime 38.0.3 has been released and is patched to fix this issue. There are no workarounds.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X