Comparison Overview

The James Douglas Studio

VS

Pete Barnes Photography

The James Douglas Studio

2530 Superior Ave. East, Cleveland, Ohio, 44114, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

The studio is a safe haven for creatives of all types to collaborate and come together to create projects often larger than themselves. We consider ourselves a cog in a much larger creative engine, while still photography is our focus *wink* collaborating with others in related fields drives us not only to better ourselves but the creative community around us.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Pete Barnes Photography

Last Update: 2025-12-13

Based in Wakefield Pete Barnes Photography offers contemporary, professional, reportage wedding photography with traditional elements. The studio in Wakefield is ideally placed to serve clients from surrounding areas such as Leeds, Sheffield and Huddersfield. Professional Yorkshire Wedding Photographer Our bespoke wedding photography service has been built up around providing clients with all their treasured photographs on a DVD, giving them the choice and freedom to print and copy their wedding photographs without having to pay high prices for re-prints. A thorough editing process comes as standard as does coverage by two photographers, this ensures your wedding photographs are of the highest quality.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-james-douglas-studio.jpeg
The James Douglas Studio
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pete-barnes-photography.jpeg
Pete Barnes Photography
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The James Douglas Studio
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pete Barnes Photography
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The James Douglas Studio in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pete Barnes Photography in 2025.

Incident History — The James Douglas Studio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The James Douglas Studio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pete Barnes Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pete Barnes Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-james-douglas-studio.jpeg
The James Douglas Studio
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pete-barnes-photography.jpeg
Pete Barnes Photography
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pete Barnes Photography company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The James Douglas Studio company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Pete Barnes Photography company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The James Douglas Studio company.

In the current year, Pete Barnes Photography company and The James Douglas Studio company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pete Barnes Photography company nor The James Douglas Studio company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pete Barnes Photography company nor The James Douglas Studio company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pete Barnes Photography company nor The James Douglas Studio company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The James Douglas Studio company nor Pete Barnes Photography company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The James Douglas Studio nor Pete Barnes Photography holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The James Douglas Studio company nor Pete Barnes Photography company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The James Douglas Studio company employs more people globally than Pete Barnes Photography company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither The James Douglas Studio nor Pete Barnes Photography holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The James Douglas Studio nor Pete Barnes Photography holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The James Douglas Studio nor Pete Barnes Photography holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The James Douglas Studio nor Pete Barnes Photography holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The James Douglas Studio nor Pete Barnes Photography holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The James Douglas Studio nor Pete Barnes Photography holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N