Comparison Overview

Hubster

VS

Shimao Group

Hubster

6991 E Camelback Rd, Scottsdale, Arizona, 85251, US
Last Update: 2025-03-07 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Hubster is a residential real estate acquisition company that places homes with investors. The transaction process is simple and transparent with no closing costs, no commission, and homes on the market typically close within 30 days. To sellers, Hubster is an easy cash option. To investors, Hubster is a source for off-market discounted inventory. The company is headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona. We specialize in: - Purchasing homes for cash - Wholesale properties for sale - Investment homes for sale - Investment strategies and advice - Full-service project management - Creative financing and investment relationships

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Shimao Group

None
Last Update: 2025-06-06 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Shimao Group has entered the real estate industry since 1989, After more than 30 years of development, the Group has made its layout in more than 100 core development cities across China, involving real estate, commercial, property management, hotel, theme entertainment and culture. Following the national strategy, Shimao continuously provides customers with high-level quality experience in living, life, consumption, business and tourism, leading the lifestyle and serving a better life.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-investor-hub.jpeg
Hubster
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/世茂房地产.jpeg
Shimao Group
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Hubster
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Shimao Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hubster in 2025.

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shimao Group in 2025.

Incident History — Hubster (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hubster cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Shimao Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shimao Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-investor-hub.jpeg
Hubster
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/世茂房地产.jpeg
Shimao Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Hubster company and Shimao Group company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Shimao Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hubster company.

In the current year, Shimao Group company and Hubster company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Shimao Group company nor Hubster company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Shimao Group company nor Hubster company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Shimao Group company nor Hubster company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hubster company nor Shimao Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hubster company nor Shimao Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Shimao Group company employs more people globally than Hubster company, reflecting its scale as a Real Estate.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Protection Against Voltage and Clock Glitches in FPGA devices, could allow an attacker with physical access to undervolt the platform resulting in a loss of confidentiality.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Malicious code was inserted into the Nx (build system) package and several related plugins. The tampered package was published to the npm software registry, via a supply-chain attack. Affected versions contain code that scans the file system, collects credentials, and posts them to GitHub as a repo under user's accounts.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In versions from 2.1.0 to before 2.3.0, the API endpoint GET /api/problems/:id returns challenge hints in plaintext within the question object, regardless of whether the user has unlocked them via point deduction. Users can view all hints for free, undermining the business logic of the platform and reducing the integrity of the challenge system. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In version 2.1.0, the /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint lacks proper access control, allowing any authenticated user to assign high-privilege badges (e.g., Staff) to themselves. This could lead to privilege escalation and impersonation of administrative roles. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

parse is a package designed to parse JavaScript SDK. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability in the SingleInstanceStateController.initializeState function of parse version 5.3.0 and before allows attackers to inject properties on Object.prototype via supplying a crafted payload, causing denial of service (DoS) as the minimum consequence.