Comparison Overview

The Image Inks Company

VS

Komplot Repro Rotterdam

The Image Inks Company

undefined, Evansville, Indiana, 47711, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.imageinks.com

At Image Inks, continued innovation for the dry-offset plastic printing industry is priority for us. Image Inks is one of the leading single source suppliers to the plastic cup, tube and lid printing industry. Although, most of our customers know us as a top quality UV ink and blanket supplier, Image Inks is a supplier of a wide range of products that include: printing blankets, UV printing inks, UV lamps, roller recovering, and many other press room supplies.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Komplot Repro Rotterdam

Beursplein, Rotterdam, 3011AA, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
https://www.welkomplot.nl

Repro Servicebedrijf. Voor al uw plot, print, kopieer en presentatiewerk. komPLOT is opgericht in 1987. Het doel van de onderneming was toen: "Het dupliceren van bouwtekeningen"​, in die tijd nog met behulp van de lichtdrukmachine. Vanaf de eerste dag is komPLOT een innovatieve onderneming geweest die altijd een stap vooruit durft te denken en dagelijks bezig was en is met het vernieuwen van productie processen. Zo stond de eerste hogesnelheidsplotter van Nederland in ons bedrijf. Aangezien de markt steeds verandert, veranderen onze producten en diensten voortdurend mee. Ondanks het feit dat komPLOT zich altijd aan veranderende omstandigheden heeft aanpast heeft zij tegelijkertijd haar karakteristieke eigenschappen, zoals service, klantgerichtheid en een hoge kwaliteit, weten te behouden. Zo ontstaat altijd een nieuw komPLOT dat voortborduurt op wat goed was in het verleden.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-image-inks-company.jpeg
The Image Inks Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/komplot.jpeg
Komplot Repro Rotterdam
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Image Inks Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Komplot Repro Rotterdam
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Image Inks Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Komplot Repro Rotterdam in 2025.

Incident History — The Image Inks Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Image Inks Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Komplot Repro Rotterdam (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Komplot Repro Rotterdam cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-image-inks-company.jpeg
The Image Inks Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/komplot.jpeg
Komplot Repro Rotterdam
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Komplot Repro Rotterdam company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Image Inks Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Komplot Repro Rotterdam company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Image Inks Company company.

In the current year, Komplot Repro Rotterdam company and The Image Inks Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Komplot Repro Rotterdam company nor The Image Inks Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Komplot Repro Rotterdam company nor The Image Inks Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Komplot Repro Rotterdam company nor The Image Inks Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Image Inks Company company nor Komplot Repro Rotterdam company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Image Inks Company nor Komplot Repro Rotterdam holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Image Inks Company company nor Komplot Repro Rotterdam company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Image Inks Company company employs more people globally than Komplot Repro Rotterdam company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither The Image Inks Company nor Komplot Repro Rotterdam holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Image Inks Company nor Komplot Repro Rotterdam holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Image Inks Company nor Komplot Repro Rotterdam holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Image Inks Company nor Komplot Repro Rotterdam holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Image Inks Company nor Komplot Repro Rotterdam holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Image Inks Company nor Komplot Repro Rotterdam holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References